An In Vitro Evaluation of Four Types of Drug-Eluting Microspheres Loaded with Doxorubicin

Thierry de Baere, Stephen Plotkin, Renee Yu, Allison Sutter, Yue Wu, Gregory M. Cruise

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    72 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose To compare in vitro properties of 4 drug-eluting embolic agents loaded with doxorubicin. Materials and Methods DC Bead (100–300 µm), LifePearl (200 µm), HepaSphere (30–60 µm), and Tandem (100 µm) microspheres were loaded with 40 mg/20 mL of doxorubicin per milliliter of microspheres. Loading, elution, diameter changes after loading, changes in the amount of doxorubicin loaded over 2 weeks in storage, and time in suspension were evaluated. Results All microspheres loaded > 99% doxorubicin within 1 hour. In vitro elution reached a plateau by 6 hours, with 30% ± 5, 21% ± 2, 8% ± 3, and 6% ± 0 of the loaded doxorubicin eluted for LifePearl, DC Bead, HepaSphere, and Tandem microspheres, respectively, with at least 1 statistically significant difference between at least 2 of the products in doxorubicin eluted at every time point. The times to elute 75% of the total released doxorubicin were 197, 139, 110, and 77 min for DC Bead, LifePearl, HepaSphere, and Tandem microspheres, respectively. The average diameters of LifePearl, DC Bead, and Tandem microspheres were reduced after loading by 24%, 20%, and 9%, respectively. After suspension in contrast medium, no changes were observed in doxorubicin loading over 2 wk. After loading, times in suspension were 8.4 min ± 0.2, 6.0 min ± 0.1, 3.1 min ± 0.2, and 2.9 min ± 0.3 for Tandem, LifePearl, DC Bead, and HepaSphere microspheres, respectively. Conclusions Although drug-eluting embolic agents universally loaded doxorubicin within 1 hour, the elution amounts, rates of release, diameter shrinkage, and times in suspension varied by product.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1425-1431
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
    Volume27
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2016

    Cite this