TY - JOUR
T1 - Avelumab First-line Maintenance for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
T2 - Analysis from JAVELIN Bladder 100 by Duration of First-line Chemotherapy and Interval Before Maintenance
AU - Sridhar, Srikala S.
AU - Powles, Thomas
AU - Climent Durán, Miguel
AU - Park, Se Hoon
AU - Massari, Francesco
AU - Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine
AU - Valderrama, Begoña P.
AU - Ullén, Anders
AU - Tsuchiya, Norihiko
AU - Aragon-Ching, Jeanny B.
AU - Gupta, Shilpa
AU - Petrylak, Daniel P.
AU - Bellmunt, Joaquim
AU - Wang, Jing
AU - Laliberte, Robert J.
AU - di Pietro, Alessandra
AU - Costa, Nuno
AU - Grivas, Petros
AU - Sternberg, Cora N.
AU - Loriot, Yohann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Background: In the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (advanced UC) without progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Objective: To report post hoc analyses of subgroups defined by the duration of first-line chemotherapy and interval before maintenance. Design, setting, and participants: Patients with advanced UC without progression after four to six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and a 4–10-wk interval after chemotherapy (n = 700) were randomized to receive avelumab + BSC or BSC alone. Subgroups were defined by duration (quartile [Q]) and estimated number of cycles of chemotherapy, and interval between chemotherapy and maintenance. The median follow-up was >19 mo in both arms. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: OS (primary endpoint), PFS, and safety were assessed. Results and limitations: Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for OS with avelumab + BSC versus BSC alone were as follows: by chemotherapy duration—Q3: 0.63 (0.39–1.00); by number of cycles—four cycles: 0.69 (0.48–1.00), five cycles: 0.98 (0.57–1.71), and six cycles: 0.66 (0.47–0.92); and by interval—4–<6 wk: 0.75 (0.54–1.04), 6–<8 wk: 0.67 (0.43–1.06), and 8–10 wk: 0.69 (0.47–1.02). Results were similar for PFS. Safety was similar across subgroups. All analyses were exploratory. Conclusions: Post hoc analyses of OS and PFS in subgroups defined by first-line chemotherapy duration and interval before maintenance were generally consistent with the results in the overall population, with similar safety findings. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these findings. Patient summary: Avelumab maintenance treatment helped patients with advanced urothelial cancer without disease progression after at least four cycles of prior chemotherapy, and who started maintenance treatment at least 4 wk after chemotherapy, to live longer.
AB - Background: In the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (advanced UC) without progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Objective: To report post hoc analyses of subgroups defined by the duration of first-line chemotherapy and interval before maintenance. Design, setting, and participants: Patients with advanced UC without progression after four to six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and a 4–10-wk interval after chemotherapy (n = 700) were randomized to receive avelumab + BSC or BSC alone. Subgroups were defined by duration (quartile [Q]) and estimated number of cycles of chemotherapy, and interval between chemotherapy and maintenance. The median follow-up was >19 mo in both arms. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: OS (primary endpoint), PFS, and safety were assessed. Results and limitations: Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for OS with avelumab + BSC versus BSC alone were as follows: by chemotherapy duration—Q3: 0.63 (0.39–1.00); by number of cycles—four cycles: 0.69 (0.48–1.00), five cycles: 0.98 (0.57–1.71), and six cycles: 0.66 (0.47–0.92); and by interval—4–<6 wk: 0.75 (0.54–1.04), 6–<8 wk: 0.67 (0.43–1.06), and 8–10 wk: 0.69 (0.47–1.02). Results were similar for PFS. Safety was similar across subgroups. All analyses were exploratory. Conclusions: Post hoc analyses of OS and PFS in subgroups defined by first-line chemotherapy duration and interval before maintenance were generally consistent with the results in the overall population, with similar safety findings. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these findings. Patient summary: Avelumab maintenance treatment helped patients with advanced urothelial cancer without disease progression after at least four cycles of prior chemotherapy, and who started maintenance treatment at least 4 wk after chemotherapy, to live longer.
KW - Bladder cancer
KW - Clinical trial
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Maintenance
KW - Phase 3
KW - Randomized
KW - Urothelial carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171381123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85171381123
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 85
SP - 154
EP - 163
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 2
ER -