TY - JOUR
T1 - Avoiding peg-filgrastim prophylaxis during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel regimen
T2 - A prospective study
AU - Vaz-Luis, Ines
AU - Barroso-Sousa, Romualdo
AU - Meglio, Antonio Di
AU - Hu, Jiani
AU - Rees, Rebecca
AU - Sinclair, Natalie
AU - Milisits, Lindsey
AU - Leone, Jose Pablo
AU - Constantine, Michael
AU - Faggen, Meredith
AU - Briccetti, Frederick
AU - Block, Caroline
AU - O'Neil, Kelly
AU - Partridge, Ann
AU - Burstein, Harold
AU - Waks, Adrienne G.
AU - Trippa, Lorenzo
AU - Tolaney, Sara M.
AU - Hassett, Michael
AU - Winer, Eric P.
AU - Lin, Nancy U.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Purpose: The use of growth factors adds considerable expense and some toxicity to adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. We tested the feasibility and safety of omitting routine peg-filgrastim use during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regimen. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm study in which patients 18 to 65 years of age who completed 4 cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for stage I-III breast cancer received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Peg-filgrastim was administered after paclitaxel only if patients had had febrile neutropenia in a prior cycle or at investigator discretion if patients had infections or treatment delays of > 1 week. Once a patient received peg-filgrastim, it was administered in all future cycles. The primary end point was the rate of paclitaxel completion within 7 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 to cycle 4 day 1. If ≥ 100 out of 125 patients completed 4 cycles of paclitaxel without dose delay, the regimen would be considered feasible. Results: The enrollment goal of 125 patients was met. Median age was 46 years (range, 21-65 years), and 112 patients (90% [95% CI, 83% to 94%]) completed dose-dense paclitaxel within 7 weeks. Omission of pegfilgrastim was not causally related to noncompletion of paclitaxel in any patients. The most common reasons for dose reduction or delays were nonhematologic. One patient experienced febrile neutropenia but was able to complete paclitaxel on time. Eight patients (6.4%) received peg-filgrastim during the trial. Overall, peg-filgrastim was administered in only 4.3% of paclitaxel cycles. Conclusion: Omission of routine peg-filgrastim during dose-dense paclitaxel according to a prespecified algorithm seems to be safe and feasible and was associated with a 95.7% reduction in the use of peg-filgrastim relative to the current standard of care.
AB - Purpose: The use of growth factors adds considerable expense and some toxicity to adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. We tested the feasibility and safety of omitting routine peg-filgrastim use during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regimen. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm study in which patients 18 to 65 years of age who completed 4 cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for stage I-III breast cancer received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Peg-filgrastim was administered after paclitaxel only if patients had had febrile neutropenia in a prior cycle or at investigator discretion if patients had infections or treatment delays of > 1 week. Once a patient received peg-filgrastim, it was administered in all future cycles. The primary end point was the rate of paclitaxel completion within 7 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 to cycle 4 day 1. If ≥ 100 out of 125 patients completed 4 cycles of paclitaxel without dose delay, the regimen would be considered feasible. Results: The enrollment goal of 125 patients was met. Median age was 46 years (range, 21-65 years), and 112 patients (90% [95% CI, 83% to 94%]) completed dose-dense paclitaxel within 7 weeks. Omission of pegfilgrastim was not causally related to noncompletion of paclitaxel in any patients. The most common reasons for dose reduction or delays were nonhematologic. One patient experienced febrile neutropenia but was able to complete paclitaxel on time. Eight patients (6.4%) received peg-filgrastim during the trial. Overall, peg-filgrastim was administered in only 4.3% of paclitaxel cycles. Conclusion: Omission of routine peg-filgrastim during dose-dense paclitaxel according to a prespecified algorithm seems to be safe and feasible and was associated with a 95.7% reduction in the use of peg-filgrastim relative to the current standard of care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088268937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.19.02484
DO - 10.1200/JCO.19.02484
M3 - Article
C2 - 32330102
AN - SCOPUS:85088268937
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 38
SP - 2390
EP - 2397
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 21
ER -