Avoiding peg-filgrastim prophylaxis during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel regimen: A prospective study

Ines Vaz-Luis, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Antonio Di Meglio, Jiani Hu, Rebecca Rees, Natalie Sinclair, Lindsey Milisits, Jose Pablo Leone, Michael Constantine, Meredith Faggen, Frederick Briccetti, Caroline Block, Kelly O'Neil, Ann Partridge, Harold Burstein, Adrienne G. Waks, Lorenzo Trippa, Sara M. Tolaney, Michael Hassett, Eric P. WinerNancy U. Lin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: The use of growth factors adds considerable expense and some toxicity to adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. We tested the feasibility and safety of omitting routine peg-filgrastim use during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regimen. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm study in which patients 18 to 65 years of age who completed 4 cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for stage I-III breast cancer received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Peg-filgrastim was administered after paclitaxel only if patients had had febrile neutropenia in a prior cycle or at investigator discretion if patients had infections or treatment delays of > 1 week. Once a patient received peg-filgrastim, it was administered in all future cycles. The primary end point was the rate of paclitaxel completion within 7 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 to cycle 4 day 1. If ≥ 100 out of 125 patients completed 4 cycles of paclitaxel without dose delay, the regimen would be considered feasible. Results: The enrollment goal of 125 patients was met. Median age was 46 years (range, 21-65 years), and 112 patients (90% [95% CI, 83% to 94%]) completed dose-dense paclitaxel within 7 weeks. Omission of pegfilgrastim was not causally related to noncompletion of paclitaxel in any patients. The most common reasons for dose reduction or delays were nonhematologic. One patient experienced febrile neutropenia but was able to complete paclitaxel on time. Eight patients (6.4%) received peg-filgrastim during the trial. Overall, peg-filgrastim was administered in only 4.3% of paclitaxel cycles. Conclusion: Omission of routine peg-filgrastim during dose-dense paclitaxel according to a prespecified algorithm seems to be safe and feasible and was associated with a 95.7% reduction in the use of peg-filgrastim relative to the current standard of care.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2390-2397
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
    Volume38
    Issue number21
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

    Cite this