Busulfan pharmacokinetics following intravenous and oral dosing regimens in children receiving high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma as part of the HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial

Introduction: Busulfan is widely used in a neuroblastoma setting, with several studies reporting marked inter-patient variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The current study reports on the pharmacokinetics of oral versus intravenous (IV) busulfan in high-risk neuroblastoma patients treated on the European HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN study. Methods: Busulfan was administered four times daily for 4 days to children aged 0.7-13.1 years, either orally (1.45-1.55 mg/kg) or by the IV route (0.8-1.2 mg/kg according to body weight strata). Blood samples were obtained prior to administration, 2, 4, and 6 h after the start of administration on dose 1. Busulfan analysis was carried out by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and data analysed using a NONMEM population pharmacokinetic approach. Results: Busulfan plasma concentrations obtained from 38 patients receiving IV busulfan and 25 patients receiving oral busulfan, were fitted simultaneously using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Lower variability in drug exposure was observed following IV administration, with a mean busulfan area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 1146 ± 187 μM.min (range 838-1622), as compared to 953 ± 290 μM.min (range 434-1427) following oral busulfan. A total of 87% of children treated with IV busulfan achieved AUC values within the target of 900-1500 μM.min versus 56% of patients following oral busulfan. Busulfan AUC values were significantly higher in HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial patients who experienced hepatic toxicity or veno-occlusive disease (VOD) (1177 ± 189 μM.min versus 913 ± 256 μM.min; p = 0.0086). Further stratification based on route of administration suggested that the incidence of hepatic toxicity was related to both high busulfan AUC and oral drug administration. Conclusion: The reduced pharmacokinetic variability and improved control of busulfan AUC observed following IV administration support its utility within the ongoing HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial.