Can a Benefit be Expected from Surgical Debulking of Unresectable Pseudomyxoma Peritonei?

Jean Baptiste Delhorme, Dominique Elias, Sharmini Varatharajah, Léonor Benhaim, Frédéric Dumont, Charles Honoré, Diane Goéré

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: This study evaluated the role of surgical debulking in improving pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP)-related symptoms if complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) of huge PMP is unachievable. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all patients in our tertiary care center treated for PMP between 1992 and 2014. All cases of surgical debulking in patients scheduled for CCRS that proved unachievable during the operation were selected for the present study. Results: Among the 338 patients operated on for PMP, 39 (11.5 %) had undergone surgical debulking because CCRS was unachievable. All of these patients were symptomatic before surgery, and the median PCI was 32 (5–39). More than 80 % of the disease burden was resected in 23 patients (59 %). Mortality and major morbidity rates were 2.5 and 23 %, respectively. After debulking surgery, symptoms gradually subsided over a median time of 23 months and 50 % of the patients no longer experienced PMP-related symptoms after a median follow-up of 24.5 months. After a median follow-up of 46.4 months (range 3–120), median overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival times were 55.5 and 20 months, respectively. Five-year OS and PFS rates were 46 and 11 %, respectively. Conclusions: Aggressive debulking surgery in case of unachievable CCRS for huge PMP can offer prolonged relief of PMP-related symptoms and long-term survival, in experienced centers that are able to be sufficiently aggressive to resect the major part of the disease, and conservative enough to achieve low mortality and good quality of life.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1618-1624
    Number of pages7
    JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
    Volume23
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016

    Cite this