Cancer risk management strategies and perceptions of unaffected women 5 years after predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations

Claire Julian-Reynier, Julien Mancini, Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Valérie Bonadona, Pascaline Berthet, Jean Pierre Fricker, Olivier Caron, Elisabeth Luporsi, Catherine Noguès

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    38 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In a French national cohort of unaffected females carriers/non-carriers of a BRCA1/2 mutation, long-term preventive strategies and breast/ovarian cancer risk perceptions were followed up to 5 years after test result disclosure, using self-administered questionnaires. Response rate was 74%. Carriers (N=101) were younger (average age±SD=37±10) than non-carriers (N=145; 42±12). There were four management strategies that comprised 88% of the decisions made by the unaffected carriers: 50% opted for breast surveillance alone, based on either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and other imaging (31%) or mammography alone (19%); 38% opted for either risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and breast surveillance, based on MRI and other imaging (28%) or mammography alone (10%). The other three strategies were: risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) and RRSO (5%), RRM alone (2%) and neither RRM/RRSO nor surveillance (6%). The results obtained for various age groups are presented here. Non-carriers often opted for screening despite their low cancer risk. Result disclosure increased carriers' short-term high breast/ovarian cancer risk perceptions (P≤0.02) and decreased non-carriers' short- and long-term perceptions (P<0.001). During follow-up, high breast cancer risk perceptions increased with time among those who had no RRM and decreased in the opposite case; high ovarian cancer risk perceptions increased further with time among those who had no RRSO and decreased in the opposite case; RRSO did not affect breast cancer risk perceptions. Informed decision-making involves letting women know whether opting for RRSO and breast MRI surveillance is as effective in terms of survival as RRM and RRSO.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)500-506
    Number of pages7
    JournalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
    Volume19
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2011

    Keywords

    • BRCA1/2 genetic testing
    • Breast/ovarian cancer
    • Preventive management
    • Risk perception

    Cite this