TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic evaluation of circulating tumour cells in patients with advanced gastric and oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma
T2 - Prognostic value and early assessment of therapeutic effects
AU - Pernot, Simon
AU - Badoual, Cecile
AU - Terme, Magali
AU - Castan, Florence
AU - Cazes, Aurelie
AU - Bouche, Olivier
AU - Bennouna, Jaafar
AU - Francois, Eric
AU - Ghiringhelli, Francois
AU - De La Fouchardiere, Christelle
AU - Samalin, Emmanuelle
AU - Bachet, Jean Baptiste
AU - Borg, Christophe
AU - Ducreux, Michel
AU - Marcheteau, Elie
AU - Stanbury, Trevor
AU - Gourgou, Sophie
AU - Malka, David
AU - Taieb, Julien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Background The identification of dynamic biomarkers in advanced gastric and oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma (GOA) could help to tailor strategies for each patient. Enumeration of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in breast, colon and prostate cancer but is not in advanced GOA. Our study aims to establish the optimal threshold and the clinical significance of CTC count in advanced GOA before and during treatment. Methods One hundred six patients with untreated advanced GOA were included in the ancillary study of the PRODIGE 17-ACCORD 20 trial. CTCs were detected in the peripheral blood using the CellSearch system on day 0 (D0) and day 28 (D28). The prognostic value of CTCs at D0 and D28 was analysed by testing several thresholds. Results At baseline, median CTC count was 1 (range, 0–415). While CTCs ≥1, 2 or 3 at D0 were all significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), CTCs ≥2 were the optimal threshold, on D0 or D28. CTCs ≥2 at D28 were also predictive of disease control. Taking into account both D0 and D28 CTC count defined 3 groups (low/low, high/low and low-high/high) with significantly different PFS (p = 0.0002) and OS (p = 0.003). Conclusion Quantification of CTCs at baseline and during treatment may be a useful prognostic tool in advanced GOA, as it is associated with worse PFS and OS. A threshold ≥2 CTCs seems to have the best discriminant value. Change in CTC count between baseline and D28 could help to tailor treatment to each individual patient.
AB - Background The identification of dynamic biomarkers in advanced gastric and oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma (GOA) could help to tailor strategies for each patient. Enumeration of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in breast, colon and prostate cancer but is not in advanced GOA. Our study aims to establish the optimal threshold and the clinical significance of CTC count in advanced GOA before and during treatment. Methods One hundred six patients with untreated advanced GOA were included in the ancillary study of the PRODIGE 17-ACCORD 20 trial. CTCs were detected in the peripheral blood using the CellSearch system on day 0 (D0) and day 28 (D28). The prognostic value of CTCs at D0 and D28 was analysed by testing several thresholds. Results At baseline, median CTC count was 1 (range, 0–415). While CTCs ≥1, 2 or 3 at D0 were all significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), CTCs ≥2 were the optimal threshold, on D0 or D28. CTCs ≥2 at D28 were also predictive of disease control. Taking into account both D0 and D28 CTC count defined 3 groups (low/low, high/low and low-high/high) with significantly different PFS (p = 0.0002) and OS (p = 0.003). Conclusion Quantification of CTCs at baseline and during treatment may be a useful prognostic tool in advanced GOA, as it is associated with worse PFS and OS. A threshold ≥2 CTCs seems to have the best discriminant value. Change in CTC count between baseline and D28 could help to tailor treatment to each individual patient.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Circulating tumour cells
KW - Clinical trial
KW - Prognosis
KW - Stomach neoplasms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018638569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.036
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.036
M3 - Article
C2 - 28456090
AN - SCOPUS:85018638569
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 79
SP - 15
EP - 22
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -