TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing the Evidence Bar for Molecular Diagnostics in Personalised Cancer Care
AU - Schneider, Daniel
AU - Bianchini, Giampaolo
AU - Horgan, Denis
AU - Michiels, Stefan
AU - Witjes, Wim
AU - Hills, Robert
AU - Plun-Favreau, Juliette
AU - Brand, Angela
AU - Lawler, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - While personalised cancer medicine holds great promise, targeting therapies to the biological characteristics of patients is limited by the number of validated biomarkers currently available. The implementation of biomarkers has undergone many challenges with few biomarkers reaching cancer patients in the clinic. There have been many biomarkers that have been published and claimed to be therapeutically useful, but few become part of the clinical decision-making process due to technical, validation and market access issues. To reduce this attrition rate, there is a significant need for policy makers and reimbursement agencies to define specific evidence requirements for the introduction of biomarkers into clinical practice. Once these requirements are more clearly defined, in an analogous manner to pharmaceuticals, researchers and diagnostic companies can better focus their biomarker research and development on meeting these specific requirements, which should lead to the more rapid introduction of new molecular oncology tests for patient benefit.
AB - While personalised cancer medicine holds great promise, targeting therapies to the biological characteristics of patients is limited by the number of validated biomarkers currently available. The implementation of biomarkers has undergone many challenges with few biomarkers reaching cancer patients in the clinic. There have been many biomarkers that have been published and claimed to be therapeutically useful, but few become part of the clinical decision-making process due to technical, validation and market access issues. To reduce this attrition rate, there is a significant need for policy makers and reimbursement agencies to define specific evidence requirements for the introduction of biomarkers into clinical practice. Once these requirements are more clearly defined, in an analogous manner to pharmaceuticals, researchers and diagnostic companies can better focus their biomarker research and development on meeting these specific requirements, which should lead to the more rapid introduction of new molecular oncology tests for patient benefit.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Clinical utility
KW - Companion diagnostic
KW - Molecular diagnostics
KW - Personalised medicine
KW - Policy
KW - Regulatory requirements
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952872394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000441556
DO - 10.1159/000441556
M3 - Article
C2 - 26571110
AN - SCOPUS:84952872394
SN - 1662-4246
VL - 18
SP - 349
EP - 358
JO - Public Health Genomics
JF - Public Health Genomics
IS - 6
ER -