Hypnosedation for endocavitary uterovaginal applications: A pilot study

Manon Kissel, Mickaël Andraud, Anne Sophie Duhamel, Geoffroy Boulle, Edouard Romano, Samir Achkar, Rémi Bourdais, Minh Hanh Ta, Arthur Pounou, Tamizhanban Kumar, Bernard Celestin, Lauriane Bordenave, Valérie Billard, Christine Haie-Meder, Cyrus Chargari

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: Implantations for uterovaginal brachytherapy are usually performed under general or spinal anesthesia, which are not without risk. As it is a rather short procedure and since postoperative pain is minimal, hypnosedation was proposed to selected patients requiring endocavitary applications as part of their routine treatment. Methods and Materials: Consecutive patients requiring intracavitary uterovaginal brachytherapy from January to October 2019 were included if they accepted the procedure. A premedication was systematically administered. Hypnosedation was based on an Ericksonian technique. The procedure was immediately interrupted if the patient requested it, in cases of extreme anxiety or pain. Procedure was in that case rescheduled with a “classical” anesthesia technique. Results: A total of 20 patients were included. Four patients had to be converted toward a general anesthesia: one because of a fibroma on the probe's way and three young patients with a very anteverted/retroverted uterus that was painful at every mobilization. Mean and maximum pain scores during implant were 2.9/10 and 5.1/10, respectively. The most painful maneuver was cervical dilation for 45% of the patients, followed by mold insertion in 40% of cases. About 85% of the patients declared that hypnosis helped them relax; 90% of the patients would recommend the technique. No procedure-related complication occurred. Conclusion: With a 70% success rate (correct implant with mean pain and anxiety scores < 5), one can conclude that uterovaginal brachytherapy implantation under hypnosedation is feasible and received a high satisfaction rate from the patients. This technique may reduce overall treatment time in a context of difficult access to the OR and to anesthesiologists, while reducing anesthetic drugs resort and postoperative nausea.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)462-469
    Number of pages8
    JournalBrachytherapy
    Volume19
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

    Keywords

    • Anesthesia
    • Anxiety
    • Brachytherapy
    • Cervix cancer
    • Endometrial cancer
    • Erickson
    • Hypnosedation
    • Hypnosis
    • Implantation
    • Inoperable

    Cite this