TY - JOUR
T1 - Image-guided tumorablation
T2 - Standardization ofterminology and reporting criteria-A 10-year update
AU - Ahmed, Muneeb
AU - Solbiati, Luigi
AU - Brace, Christopher L.
AU - Breen, David J.
AU - Callstrom, Matthew R.
AU - Charboneau, J. William
AU - Chen, Min Hua
AU - Choi, Byung Ihn
AU - De Baère, Thierry
AU - Dodd, Gerald D.
AU - Dupuy, Damian E.
AU - Gervais, Debra A.
AU - Gianfelice, David
AU - Gillams, Alice R.
AU - Lee, Fred T.
AU - Leen, Edward
AU - Lencioni, Riccardo
AU - Littrup, Peter J.
AU - Livraghi, Tito
AU - Lu, David S.
AU - Mcgahan, John P.
AU - Meloni, Maria Franca
AU - Nikolic, Boris
AU - Pereira, Philippe L.
AU - Liang, Ping
AU - Rhim, Hyunchul
AU - Rose, Steven C.
AU - Salem, Riad
AU - Sofocleous, Constantinos T.
AU - Solomon, Stephen B.
AU - Soulen, Michael C.
AU - Tanaka, Masatoshi
AU - Vogl, Thomas J.
AU - Wood, Bradford J.
AU - Goldberg, S. Nahum
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2014.
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Image-guided tumor ablation has become a well-established hallmark of local cancer therapy. The breadth of options available in this growing field increases the need for standardization of terminology and reporting criteria to facilitate effective communication of ideas and appropriate comparison among treatments that use different technologies, such as chemical (eg, ethanol or acetic acid) ablation, thermal therapies (eg, radiofrequency, laser, microwave, focused ultrasound, and cryoablation) and newer ablative modalities such as irreversible electroporation. This updated consensus document provides a framework that will facilitate the clearest communication among investigators regarding ablative technologies. An appropriate vehicle is proposed for reporting the various aspects of image-guided ablation therapy including classification of therapies, procedure terms, descriptors of imaging guidance, and terminology for imaging and pathologic findings. Methods are addressed for standardizing reporting of technique, follow-up, complications, and clinical results. As noted in the original document from 2003, adherence to the recommendations will improve the precision of communications in this field, leading to more accurate comparison of technologies and results, and ultimately to improved patient outcomes.
AB - Image-guided tumor ablation has become a well-established hallmark of local cancer therapy. The breadth of options available in this growing field increases the need for standardization of terminology and reporting criteria to facilitate effective communication of ideas and appropriate comparison among treatments that use different technologies, such as chemical (eg, ethanol or acetic acid) ablation, thermal therapies (eg, radiofrequency, laser, microwave, focused ultrasound, and cryoablation) and newer ablative modalities such as irreversible electroporation. This updated consensus document provides a framework that will facilitate the clearest communication among investigators regarding ablative technologies. An appropriate vehicle is proposed for reporting the various aspects of image-guided ablation therapy including classification of therapies, procedure terms, descriptors of imaging guidance, and terminology for imaging and pathologic findings. Methods are addressed for standardizing reporting of technique, follow-up, complications, and clinical results. As noted in the original document from 2003, adherence to the recommendations will improve the precision of communications in this field, leading to more accurate comparison of technologies and results, and ultimately to improved patient outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925365673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 25442132
AN - SCOPUS:84925365673
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 25
SP - 1691-1705.e4
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 11
ER -