Immune checkpoint inhibitors for POLE or POLD1 proofreading-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer

M. Ambrosini, B. Rousseau, P. Manca, O. Artz, A. Marabelle, T. André, G. Maddalena, G. Mazzoli, R. Intini, R. Cohen, A. Cercek, N. H. Segal, L. Saltz, A. M. Varghese, R. Yaeger, M. Nusrat, Z. Goldberg, G. Y. Ku, I. El Dika, O. MargalitA. Grinshpun, P. Murtaza Kasi, R. Schilsky, A. Lutfi, E. Shacham-Shmueli, M. Khan Afghan, L. Weiss, C. B. Westphalen, V. Conca, B. Decker, G. Randon, E. Elez, M. Fakih, A. B. Schrock, C. Cremolini, P. Jayachandran, M. J. Overman, S. Lonardi, F. Pietrantonio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: POLE and POLD1 proofreading deficiency (POLE/D1pd) define a rare subtype of ultramutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; over 100 mut/Mb). Disease-specific data about the activity and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in POLE/D1pd mCRC are lacking and it is unknown whether outcomes may be different from mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRCs treated with ICIs. Patients and methods: In this global study, we collected 27 patients with mCRC harboring POLE/D1 mutations leading to proofreading deficiency and treated with anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 alone +/− anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 agents. We collected clinicopathological and genomic characteristics, response, and survival outcomes after ICIs of POLE/D1pd mCRC and compared them with a cohort of 610 dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICIs. Further genomic analyses were carried out in an independent cohort of 7241 CRCs to define POLE and POLD1pd molecular profiles and mutational signatures. Results: POLE/D1pd was associated with younger age, male sex, fewer RAS/BRAF driver mutations, and predominance of right-sided colon cancers. Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC (89% versus 54%; P = 0.01). After a median follow-up of 24.9 months (interquartile range: 11.3-43.0 months), patients with POLE/D1pd showed a significantly superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.74, P = 0.01] and superior overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.18, P = 0.09). In multivariable analyses including the type of DNA repair defect, POLE/D1pd was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.69, P = 0.013) and OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.98, P = 0.047). Molecular profiling showed that POLE/D1pd tumors have higher tumor mutational burden (TMB). Responses were observed in both subtypes and were associated with the intensity of POLE/D1pd signature. Conclusions: Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed more favorable outcomes compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC to treatment with ICIs in terms of tumor response and survival.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)643-655
    Number of pages13
    JournalAnnals of Oncology
    Volume35
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2024

    Keywords

    • POLD1 mutations
    • POLE mutations
    • immune checkpoint inhibitors
    • metastatic colorectal cancer
    • proofreading deficiency

    Cite this