TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of MET status on treatment outcomes in papillary renal cell carcinoma
T2 - A pooled analysis of historical data
AU - Albiges, Laurence
AU - Heng, Daniel Y.C.
AU - Lee, Jae Lyun
AU - Walker, Stephen
AU - Mellemgaard, Anders
AU - Ottesen, Lone
AU - Frigault, Melanie M.
AU - L'Hernault, Anne
AU - Wessen, Jonathan
AU - Choueiri, Toni
AU - Cancel, Mathilde
AU - Signoretti, Sabina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) represents 15% of RCCs but has no indicated therapies, with limited biomarker-based data to inform targeted treatment. MET alterations may be key; > 80% of PRCC tumours show MET upregulation. The objective of this study was to assess MET status in PRCC and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included patients with locally advanced/metastatic PRCC from three international registries. MET status was determined retrospectively by next generation sequencing (NGS) of archival tissue. MET-driven was defined as MET and/or hepatocyte growth factor amplification, chromosome 7 gain, and/or MET kinase domain mutations. Objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by MET status using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of 308 patients, 305 received first-line treatment; most commonly sunitinib (n = 208; 68%), then everolimus (n = 40; 13%). Of 179 patients with valid NGS results, 38% had MET-driven and 49% MET-independent tumours (13% unevaluable). In the MET-driven versus MET-independent subgroups, respectively, of sunitinib-treated patients, median PFS was numerically longer, though not statistically significantly; PFS: 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4–13.2) versus 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.4), hazard ratio (HR) = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.41–1.08. There was no difference between the OS of each subgroup. Conclusions: MET-driven PRCC may respond to targeted agents. However, the presence of MET alterations did not appear to be predictive for outcomes in response to current therapies, which are not biomarker-driven, compared with MET-independent tumours.
AB - Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) represents 15% of RCCs but has no indicated therapies, with limited biomarker-based data to inform targeted treatment. MET alterations may be key; > 80% of PRCC tumours show MET upregulation. The objective of this study was to assess MET status in PRCC and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included patients with locally advanced/metastatic PRCC from three international registries. MET status was determined retrospectively by next generation sequencing (NGS) of archival tissue. MET-driven was defined as MET and/or hepatocyte growth factor amplification, chromosome 7 gain, and/or MET kinase domain mutations. Objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by MET status using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of 308 patients, 305 received first-line treatment; most commonly sunitinib (n = 208; 68%), then everolimus (n = 40; 13%). Of 179 patients with valid NGS results, 38% had MET-driven and 49% MET-independent tumours (13% unevaluable). In the MET-driven versus MET-independent subgroups, respectively, of sunitinib-treated patients, median PFS was numerically longer, though not statistically significantly; PFS: 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4–13.2) versus 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.3–7.4), hazard ratio (HR) = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.41–1.08. There was no difference between the OS of each subgroup. Conclusions: MET-driven PRCC may respond to targeted agents. However, the presence of MET alterations did not appear to be predictive for outcomes in response to current therapies, which are not biomarker-driven, compared with MET-independent tumours.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Clinical-stage research
KW - Drug targets
KW - Genitourinary cancers
KW - MET
KW - PRCC
KW - Sunitinib
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131091568&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.021
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 35640484
AN - SCOPUS:85131091568
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 170
SP - 158
EP - 168
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -