TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of Different Measurement Methods of Arterial Input Function on Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters in Head and Neck Cancer
AU - Dong, Wanxin
AU - Volk, Andreas
AU - Djaroum, Meriem
AU - Girot, Charly
AU - Balleyguier, Corinne
AU - Lebon, Vincent
AU - Garcia, Gabriel
AU - Ammari, Samy
AU - Temam, Stéphane
AU - Gorphe, Philippe
AU - Wei, Lecong
AU - Pitre-Champagnat, Stéphanie
AU - Lassau, Nathalie
AU - Bidault, François
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) helps in diagnosis and prognosis. Quantitative DCE-MRI requires an arterial input function (AIF), which affects the values of pharmacokinetic parameters (PKP). Purpose: To evaluate influence of four individual AIF measurement methods on quantitative DCE-MRI parameters values (Ktrans, ve, kep, and vp), for HNC and muscle. Study Type: Prospective. Population: A total of 34 HNC patients (23 males, 11 females, age range 24–91). Field Strength/Sequence: A 3 T; 3D SPGR gradient echo sequence with partial saturation of inflowing spins. Assessment: Four AIF methods were applied: automatic AIF (AIFa) with up to 50 voxels selected from the whole FOV, manual AIF (AIFm) with four voxels selected from the internal carotid artery, both conditions without (Mc−) or with (Mc+) motion correction. Comparison endpoints were peak AIF values, PKP values in tumor and muscle, and tumor/muscle PKP ratios. Statistical Tests: Nonparametric Friedman test for multiple comparisons. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test, without and with Benjamini Hochberg correction, for pairwise comparison of AIF peak values and PKP values for tumor, muscle and tumor/muscle ratio, P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Peak AIF values differed significantly for all AIF methods, with mean AIFmMc+ peaks being up to 66.4% higher than those for AIFaMc+. Almost all PKP values were significantly higher for AIFa in both, tumor and muscle, up to 76% for mean Ktrans values. Motion correction effect was smaller. Considering tumor/muscle parameter ratios, most differences were not significant (0.068 ≤ Wilcoxon P value ≤ 0.8). Data Conclusion: We observed important differences in PKP values when using either AIFa or AIFm, consequently choice of a standardized AIF method is mandatory for DCE-MRI on HNC. From the study findings, AIFm and inflow compensation are recommended. The use of the tumor/muscle PKP ratio should be of interest for multicenter studies. Evidence Level: 2. Technical Efficacy: Stage 1.
AB - Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) helps in diagnosis and prognosis. Quantitative DCE-MRI requires an arterial input function (AIF), which affects the values of pharmacokinetic parameters (PKP). Purpose: To evaluate influence of four individual AIF measurement methods on quantitative DCE-MRI parameters values (Ktrans, ve, kep, and vp), for HNC and muscle. Study Type: Prospective. Population: A total of 34 HNC patients (23 males, 11 females, age range 24–91). Field Strength/Sequence: A 3 T; 3D SPGR gradient echo sequence with partial saturation of inflowing spins. Assessment: Four AIF methods were applied: automatic AIF (AIFa) with up to 50 voxels selected from the whole FOV, manual AIF (AIFm) with four voxels selected from the internal carotid artery, both conditions without (Mc−) or with (Mc+) motion correction. Comparison endpoints were peak AIF values, PKP values in tumor and muscle, and tumor/muscle PKP ratios. Statistical Tests: Nonparametric Friedman test for multiple comparisons. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test, without and with Benjamini Hochberg correction, for pairwise comparison of AIF peak values and PKP values for tumor, muscle and tumor/muscle ratio, P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Peak AIF values differed significantly for all AIF methods, with mean AIFmMc+ peaks being up to 66.4% higher than those for AIFaMc+. Almost all PKP values were significantly higher for AIFa in both, tumor and muscle, up to 76% for mean Ktrans values. Motion correction effect was smaller. Considering tumor/muscle parameter ratios, most differences were not significant (0.068 ≤ Wilcoxon P value ≤ 0.8). Data Conclusion: We observed important differences in PKP values when using either AIFa or AIFm, consequently choice of a standardized AIF method is mandatory for DCE-MRI on HNC. From the study findings, AIFm and inflow compensation are recommended. The use of the tumor/muscle PKP ratio should be of interest for multicenter studies. Evidence Level: 2. Technical Efficacy: Stage 1.
KW - AIF measurement methods
KW - DCE-MRI
KW - arterial input function
KW - head and neck cancer
KW - pharmacokinetic parameters
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140269321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.28486
DO - 10.1002/jmri.28486
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140269321
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 58
SP - 122
EP - 132
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 1
ER -