TY - JOUR
T1 - Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC
T2 - first-generation or next-generation TKI?
AU - Recondo, Gonzalo
AU - Facchinetti, Francesco
AU - Olaussen, Ken A.
AU - Besse, Benjamin
AU - Friboulet, Luc
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - The traditional approach to the treatment of patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harbouring ALK rearrangements or EGFR mutations has been the sequential administration of therapies (sequential treatment approach), in which patients first receive first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which are eventually replaced by next-generation TKIs and/or chemotherapy upon disease progression, in a decision optionally guided by tumour molecular profiling. In the past few years, this strategy has been challenged by clinical evidence showing improved progression-free survival, improved intracranial disease control and a generally favourable toxicity profile when next-generation EGFR and ALK TKIs are used in the first-line setting. In this Review, we describe the existing preclinical and clinical evidence supporting both treatment strategies — the ‘historical’ sequential treatment strategy and the use of next-generation TKIs — as frontline therapies and discuss the suitability of both strategies for patients with EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC.
AB - The traditional approach to the treatment of patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harbouring ALK rearrangements or EGFR mutations has been the sequential administration of therapies (sequential treatment approach), in which patients first receive first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which are eventually replaced by next-generation TKIs and/or chemotherapy upon disease progression, in a decision optionally guided by tumour molecular profiling. In the past few years, this strategy has been challenged by clinical evidence showing improved progression-free survival, improved intracranial disease control and a generally favourable toxicity profile when next-generation EGFR and ALK TKIs are used in the first-line setting. In this Review, we describe the existing preclinical and clinical evidence supporting both treatment strategies — the ‘historical’ sequential treatment strategy and the use of next-generation TKIs — as frontline therapies and discuss the suitability of both strategies for patients with EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052535675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41571-018-0081-4
DO - 10.1038/s41571-018-0081-4
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30108370
AN - SCOPUS:85052535675
SN - 1759-4774
VL - 15
SP - 694
EP - 708
JO - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
JF - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
IS - 11
ER -