TY - JOUR
T1 - Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC)
T2 - An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group
AU - MACH-NC Collaborative Group
AU - Lacas, Benjamin
AU - Carmel, Alexandra
AU - Landais, Cécile
AU - Wong, Stuart J.
AU - Licitra, Lisa
AU - Tobias, Jeffrey S.
AU - Burtness, Barbara
AU - Ghi, Maria Grazia
AU - Cohen, Ezra E.W.
AU - Grau, Cai
AU - Wolf, Gregory
AU - Hitt, Ricardo
AU - Corvò, Renzo
AU - Budach, Volker
AU - Kumar, Shaleen
AU - Laskar, Sarbani Ghosh
AU - Mazeron, Jean Jacques
AU - Zhong, Lai Ping
AU - Dobrowsky, Werner
AU - Ghadjar, Pirus
AU - Fallai, Carlo
AU - Zakotnik, Branko
AU - Sharma, Atul
AU - Bensadoun, René Jean
AU - Ruo Redda, Maria Grazia
AU - Racadot, Séverine
AU - Fountzilas, George
AU - Brizel, David
AU - Rovea, Paolo
AU - Argiris, Athanassios
AU - Nagy, Zoltán Takácsi
AU - Lee, Ju Whei
AU - Fortpied, Catherine
AU - Harris, Jonathan
AU - Bourhis, Jean
AU - Aupérin, Anne
AU - Blanchard, Pierre
AU - Pignon, Jean Pierre
AU - Adelstein, D. J.
AU - Alfonsi, M.
AU - Belkacemi, Y.
AU - Bar-Ad, V.
AU - Bernier, J.
AU - Bratland,
AU - Calais, G.
AU - Campbell, B.
AU - Caudell, J.
AU - Chabaud, S.
AU - Chamorey, E.
AU - Chaukar, D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Background and purpose: The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results. Materials and methods: Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint. Results: For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005). Conclusion: The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer.
AB - Background and purpose: The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results. Materials and methods: Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint. Results: For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005). Conclusion: The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Head and Neck Cancer
KW - Individual Patient Data
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Randomised Clinical Trials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102363781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.013
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 33515668
AN - SCOPUS:85102363781
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 156
SP - 281
EP - 293
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
ER -