TY - JOUR
T1 - Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
T2 - Two-year outcomes from two randomized, open-label, phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057)
AU - Horn, Leora
AU - Spigel, David R.
AU - Vokes, Everett E.
AU - Holgado, Esther
AU - Ready, Neal
AU - Steins, Martin
AU - Poddubskaya, Elena
AU - Borghaei, Hossein
AU - Felip, Enriqueta
AU - Paz-Ares, Luis
AU - Pluzanski, Adam
AU - Reckamp, Karen L.
AU - Burgio, Marco A.
AU - Kohlhäeufl, Martin
AU - Waterhouse, David
AU - Barlesi, Fabrice
AU - Antonia, Scott
AU - Arrieta, Oscar
AU - Fayette, Jérôme
AU - Crinò, Lucio
AU - Rizvi, Naiyer
AU - Reck, Martin
AU - Hellmann, Matthew D.
AU - Geese, William J.
AU - Li, Ang
AU - Blackwood-Chirchir, Anne
AU - Healey, Diane
AU - Brahmer, Julie
AU - Eberhardt, Wilfried E.E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2017/12/10
Y1 - 2017/12/10
N2 - Purpose: Nivolumab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, prolonged overall survival compared with docetaxel in two independent phase III studies in previously treated patients with advanced squamous (CheckMate 017; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01642004) or nonsquamous (CheckMate 057; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01673867) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report updated results, including a pooled analysis of the two studies. Methods: Patients with stage IIIB/IV squamous (N = 272) or nonsquamous (N = 582) NSCLC and disease progression during or after prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). Minimum follow-up for survival was 24.2 months. Results: Two-year overall survival rates with nivolumab versus docetaxel were 23% (95% CI, 16% to 30%) versus 8% (95% CI, 4% to 13%) in squamous NSCLC and 29% (95% CI, 24% to 34%) versus 16% (95% CI, 12% to 20%) in nonsquamous NSCLC; relative reductions in the risk of death with nivolumab versus docetaxel remained similar to those reported in the primary analyses. Durable responses were observed with nivolumab; 10 (37%) of 27 confirmed responders with squamous NSCLC and 19 (34%) of 56 with nonsquamous NSCLC had ongoing responses after 2 years' minimum follow-up. No patient in either docetaxel group had an ongoing response. In the pooled analysis, the relative reduction inthe risk of death with nivolumab versus docetaxel was 28% (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.84), and rates of treatment-related adverse events were lower with nivolumab than with docetaxel (any grade, 68% v 88%; grade 3 to 4, 10% v 55%). Conclusion: Nivolumab provides long-term clinical benefit and a favorable tolerability profile compared with docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC.
AB - Purpose: Nivolumab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, prolonged overall survival compared with docetaxel in two independent phase III studies in previously treated patients with advanced squamous (CheckMate 017; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01642004) or nonsquamous (CheckMate 057; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01673867) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report updated results, including a pooled analysis of the two studies. Methods: Patients with stage IIIB/IV squamous (N = 272) or nonsquamous (N = 582) NSCLC and disease progression during or after prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). Minimum follow-up for survival was 24.2 months. Results: Two-year overall survival rates with nivolumab versus docetaxel were 23% (95% CI, 16% to 30%) versus 8% (95% CI, 4% to 13%) in squamous NSCLC and 29% (95% CI, 24% to 34%) versus 16% (95% CI, 12% to 20%) in nonsquamous NSCLC; relative reductions in the risk of death with nivolumab versus docetaxel remained similar to those reported in the primary analyses. Durable responses were observed with nivolumab; 10 (37%) of 27 confirmed responders with squamous NSCLC and 19 (34%) of 56 with nonsquamous NSCLC had ongoing responses after 2 years' minimum follow-up. No patient in either docetaxel group had an ongoing response. In the pooled analysis, the relative reduction inthe risk of death with nivolumab versus docetaxel was 28% (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.84), and rates of treatment-related adverse events were lower with nivolumab than with docetaxel (any grade, 68% v 88%; grade 3 to 4, 10% v 55%). Conclusion: Nivolumab provides long-term clinical benefit and a favorable tolerability profile compared with docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037986316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062
M3 - Article
C2 - 29023213
AN - SCOPUS:85037986316
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 35
SP - 3924
EP - 3933
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 35
ER -