Outcomes of patients with resected stage III/IV acral or mucosal melanoma, treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy

Sarah K. Jacques, Janet McKeown, Piyush Grover, Douglas B. Johnson, Anne Zaremba, Florentia Dimitriou, Roi Weiser, Mohamad Farid, Kenjiro Namikawa, Ryan J. Sullivan, Piotr Rutkowski, Celeste Lebbe, Omid Hamid, Jonathan S. Zager, Olivier Michielin, Bart Neyns, Yasuhiro Nakamura, Caroline Robert, Janice Mehnert, Paolo A. AsciertoPrachi Bhave, Benjamin Park, Lisa Zimmer, Joanna Mangana, Megan Mooradian, Joanna Placzke, Clare Allayous, Isabella C. Glitza Oliva, Inderjit Mehmi, Danielle Depalo, Alexandre Wicky, Julia K. Schwarze, Severine Roy, Christina Boatwright, Vito Vanella, Georgina V. Long, Alexander M. Menzies, Serigne N. Lo, Matteo S. Carlino

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Importance: Acral (AM) and mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare subtypes with a poor prognosis. In those with advanced disease, anti-PD-1 (PD1) therapy has reduced activity compared to that seen in non-acral cutaneous melanoma. Objective: To determine the efficacy of adjuvant PD1 in resected AM or MM. Design: An international, retrospective cohort study Setting: Data up to November 2021 collected from 20 centres across 10 countries. Participants: One hundred and ninety four patients with resected stage III or IV1 AM or MM who received adjuvant PD1 were included and compared to matched patients from the Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) database using a propensity score matching analysis. Main outcomes and measures: Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results: Forty five of 139 (32%) AM and 9 of 55 (16%) MM patients completed adjuvant therapy. The main reason for early treatment cessation in both groups was disease recurrence: 51 (37%) and 30 (55%) in the AM and MM groups, respectively. In the AM group adjuvant PD1 was associated with a longer RFS [HR-0.69 (0.52–0.92, p = 0.0127)], DMFS [HR0.58 (0.38–0.89, p = 0.0134)] and OS [HR of 0.59 (0.38–0.92, p-value 0.0196)] when compared to the historical cohort. In the MM group there was no statistical difference in RFS [HR1.36 (0.69–2.68,p-value 0.3799], DMFS or OS. Conclusion and relevance: After adjuvant PD1, both AM and MM have a high risk of recurrence. Our data suggests a benefit to using adjuvant PD1 therapy in resected AM but not in resected MM. Additional studies to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant PD1 for MM are needed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number113563
    JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
    Volume199
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2024

    Keywords

    • Acral melanoma
    • Adjuvant
    • Anti-PD1
    • Immunotherapy
    • Mucosal melanoma

    Cite this