TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-reported outcomes in patients with PIK3CA-mutated hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- Negative Advanced Breast Cancer from SOLAR-1
AU - Ciruelos, Eva Maria
AU - Rugo, Hope S.
AU - Mayer, Ingrid A.
AU - Levy, Christelle
AU - Forget, Frederic
AU - Mingorance, Juan Ignacio Delgado
AU - Safra, Tamar
AU - Masuda, Norikazu
AU - Park, Yeon Hee
AU - Juric, Dejan
AU - Conte, Pierfranco
AU - Campone, Mario
AU - Loibl, Sibylle
AU - Iwata, Hiroji
AU - Zhou, Xiaolei
AU - Park, Jinhee
AU - Ridolfi, Antonia
AU - Lorenzo, Ines
AU - André, Fabrice
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/6/20
Y1 - 2021/6/20
N2 - PURPOSE In the phase III SOLAR-1 trial (NCT02437318), the PI3Ka-selective inhibitor and degrader alpelisib significantly improved median progression-free survival when added to fulvestrant in patients with phosphatidylinositol- 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA)-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. We assessed health-related quality of life using patient-reported outcome measures in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the PIK3CA-mutant cohort, 341 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive alpelisib 300 mg daily or placebo plus fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL of Cancer Patients and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form questionnaires. Changes from baseline and time to 10% deterioration were analyzed using repeated measurement models and Cox models, respectively. RESULTS Global Health Status/QoL and functional status were maintained from baseline (mean changes < 10 points) in the alpelisib (overall change from baseline [95% CI], 23.50 [28.02 to 1.02]) and placebo arms (overall change from baseline [95% CI], 0.27 [24.48 to 5.02]). Overall treatment effect in Global Health Status/ QoL was not significantly different between arms (23.77; 95% CI, 28.35 to 0.80; P 5 .101). Time to 10% deterioration for Global Health Status/QoL was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.48). Compared with placebo, deterioration in social functioning and in diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea or vomiting, and fatigue symptom subscales occurred with alpelisib. Numerical improvement in Worst Pain was observed with alpelisib versus placebo (42% v 32%, week 24; P 5 .090). CONCLUSION In SOLAR-1, there was no statistical difference in deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL between arms, whereas symptom subscales favored placebo for diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea or vomiting, and fatigue, known side effects of alpelisib. Treatment decisions must consider efficacy and tolerability; taken with clinical efficacy, these results support the benefit-risk profile of alpelisib in patients with hormone receptor- positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer.
AB - PURPOSE In the phase III SOLAR-1 trial (NCT02437318), the PI3Ka-selective inhibitor and degrader alpelisib significantly improved median progression-free survival when added to fulvestrant in patients with phosphatidylinositol- 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA)-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. We assessed health-related quality of life using patient-reported outcome measures in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the PIK3CA-mutant cohort, 341 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive alpelisib 300 mg daily or placebo plus fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL of Cancer Patients and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form questionnaires. Changes from baseline and time to 10% deterioration were analyzed using repeated measurement models and Cox models, respectively. RESULTS Global Health Status/QoL and functional status were maintained from baseline (mean changes < 10 points) in the alpelisib (overall change from baseline [95% CI], 23.50 [28.02 to 1.02]) and placebo arms (overall change from baseline [95% CI], 0.27 [24.48 to 5.02]). Overall treatment effect in Global Health Status/ QoL was not significantly different between arms (23.77; 95% CI, 28.35 to 0.80; P 5 .101). Time to 10% deterioration for Global Health Status/QoL was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.48). Compared with placebo, deterioration in social functioning and in diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea or vomiting, and fatigue symptom subscales occurred with alpelisib. Numerical improvement in Worst Pain was observed with alpelisib versus placebo (42% v 32%, week 24; P 5 .090). CONCLUSION In SOLAR-1, there was no statistical difference in deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL between arms, whereas symptom subscales favored placebo for diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea or vomiting, and fatigue, known side effects of alpelisib. Treatment decisions must consider efficacy and tolerability; taken with clinical efficacy, these results support the benefit-risk profile of alpelisib in patients with hormone receptor- positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108386804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.20.01139
DO - 10.1200/JCO.20.01139
M3 - Article
C2 - 33780274
AN - SCOPUS:85108386804
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 39
SP - 2005
EP - 2015
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 18
ER -