Percutaneous Fixation of Impending Fracture of the Hip

Charles Roux; Lambros Tselikas; Alexandre Delpla; Steven Yevich; Christophe Teriitehau; Antoine Hakime; Eloi Varin; Adrian Kobe; Thierry de Baère; Frédéric Deschamps

doi:10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100802

Percutaneous Fixation of Impending Fracture of the Hip

Charles Roux, Lambros Tselikas, Alexandre Delpla, Steven Yevich, Christophe Teriitehau, Antoine Hakime, Eloi Varin, Adrian Kobe, Thierry de Baère, Frédéric Deschamps

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to the literature, prophylactic consolidation of proximal femur lytic metastasis the is recommended when the Mirels’ score is above 8. Osteoplasty (cementoplasty of proximal femur) alone provides inadequate consolidation. Various mini-invasive technics, augmented osteoplasties, have been proposed for better long-term consolidation. The aim of this review is to detail the augmented osteoplasty techniques described in the literature and to report their safeties and efficacies to prevent pathological fracture of the proximal femur. A PubMed research found 8 studies that evaluated augmented osteoplasty of the proximal femur in cancer patients. All devices demonstrate adequate safety and low rate of secondary pathological fractures.

Original language	English
Article number	100802
Journal	Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume	25
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100802
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2022

Keywords

Hip
Impending fracture
interventional radiology
mini-invasive procedure
percutaneous fixation

Access to Document

10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100802

Cite this

@article{3b2f519650ec4f7ea3cb03834be4fe73,

title = "Percutaneous Fixation of Impending Fracture of the Hip",

abstract = "According to the literature, prophylactic consolidation of proximal femur lytic metastasis the is recommended when the Mirels{\textquoteright} score is above 8. Osteoplasty (cementoplasty of proximal femur) alone provides inadequate consolidation. Various mini-invasive technics, augmented osteoplasties, have been proposed for better long-term consolidation. The aim of this review is to detail the augmented osteoplasty techniques described in the literature and to report their safeties and efficacies to prevent pathological fracture of the proximal femur. A PubMed research found 8 studies that evaluated augmented osteoplasty of the proximal femur in cancer patients. All devices demonstrate adequate safety and low rate of secondary pathological fractures.",

keywords = "Hip, Impending fracture, interventional radiology, mini-invasive procedure, percutaneous fixation",

author = "Charles Roux and Lambros Tselikas and Alexandre Delpla and Steven Yevich and Christophe Teriitehau and Antoine Hakime and Eloi Varin and Adrian Kobe and {de Ba{\`e}re}, Thierry and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Deschamps",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2022",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100802",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

journal = "Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology",

issn = "1089-2516",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous Fixation of Impending Fracture of the Hip

AU - Roux, Charles

AU - Tselikas, Lambros

AU - Delpla, Alexandre

AU - Yevich, Steven

AU - Teriitehau, Christophe

AU - Hakime, Antoine

AU - Varin, Eloi

AU - Kobe, Adrian

AU - de Baère, Thierry

AU - Deschamps, Frédéric

PY - 2022/3/1

Y1 - 2022/3/1

N2 - According to the literature, prophylactic consolidation of proximal femur lytic metastasis the is recommended when the Mirels’ score is above 8. Osteoplasty (cementoplasty of proximal femur) alone provides inadequate consolidation. Various mini-invasive technics, augmented osteoplasties, have been proposed for better long-term consolidation. The aim of this review is to detail the augmented osteoplasty techniques described in the literature and to report their safeties and efficacies to prevent pathological fracture of the proximal femur. A PubMed research found 8 studies that evaluated augmented osteoplasty of the proximal femur in cancer patients. All devices demonstrate adequate safety and low rate of secondary pathological fractures.

AB - According to the literature, prophylactic consolidation of proximal femur lytic metastasis the is recommended when the Mirels’ score is above 8. Osteoplasty (cementoplasty of proximal femur) alone provides inadequate consolidation. Various mini-invasive technics, augmented osteoplasties, have been proposed for better long-term consolidation. The aim of this review is to detail the augmented osteoplasty techniques described in the literature and to report their safeties and efficacies to prevent pathological fracture of the proximal femur. A PubMed research found 8 studies that evaluated augmented osteoplasty of the proximal femur in cancer patients. All devices demonstrate adequate safety and low rate of secondary pathological fractures.

KW - Hip

KW - Impending fracture

KW - interventional radiology

KW - mini-invasive procedure

KW - percutaneous fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124044337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100802

DO - 10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100802

M3 - Article

C2 - 35248326

AN - SCOPUS:85124044337

SN - 1089-2516

VL - 25

JO - Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology

IS - 1

M1 - 100802

ER -

Percutaneous Fixation of Impending Fracture of the Hip

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this