TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase I study of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitor navoximod (GDC-0919) administered with PD-L1 inhibitor (atezolizumab) in advanced solid tumors
AU - Jung, Kyung Hae
AU - LoRusso, Patricia
AU - Burris, Howard
AU - Gordon, Michael
AU - Bang, Yung Jue
AU - Hellmann, Matthew D.
AU - Cervantes, Andres
AU - Ochoa de Olza, Maria
AU - Marabelle, Aurelien
AU - Stephen Hodi, F.
AU - Ahn, Myung Ju
AU - Emens, Leisha A.
AU - Barlesi, Fabrice
AU - Hamid, Omid
AU - Calvo, Emiliano
AU - McDermott, David
AU - Soliman, Hatem
AU - Rhee, Ina
AU - Lin, Ray
AU - Pourmohamad, Tony
AU - Suchomel, Julia
AU - Tsuhako, Amy
AU - Morrissey, Kari
AU - Mahrus, Sami
AU - Morley, Roland
AU - Pirzkall, Andrea
AU - Lindsey Davis, S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Purpose: IDO1 induces immune suppression in T cells through L-tryptophan (Trp) depletion and kynurenine (Kyn) accumulation in the local tumor microenvironment, suppressing effector T cells and hyperactivating regulatory T cells (Treg). Navoximod is an investigational small-molecule inhibitor of IDO1. This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of navoximod in combination with atezolizumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Patients and Methods: The study consisted of a 3 þ 3 dose-escalation stage (n ¼ 66) and a tumor-specific expansion stage (n ¼ 92). Navoximod was given orally every 12 hours continuously for 21 consecutive days of each cycle with the exception of cycle 1, where navoximod administration started on day 1 to characterize pharmacokinetics. Atezolizumab was administered by intravenous infusion 1,200 mg every 3 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. Results: Patients (n ¼ 157) received navoximod at 6 dose levels (50–1,000 mg) in combination with atezolizumab. The maximum administered dose was 1,000 mg twice daily; the MTD was not reached. Navoximod demonstrated a linear pharmacokinetic profile, and plasma Kyn generally decreased with increasing doses of navoximod. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (22%), rash (22%), and chromaturia (20%). Activity was observed at all dose levels in various tumor types (melanoma, pancreatic, prostate, ovarian, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, cervical, neural sheath, non–small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial bladder cancer): 6 (9%) dose-escalation patients achieved partial response, and 10 (11%) expansion patients achieved partial response or complete response. Conclusions: The combination of navoximod and atezolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics for patients with advanced cancer. Although activity was observed, there was no clear evidence of benefit from adding navoximod to atezolizumab.
AB - Purpose: IDO1 induces immune suppression in T cells through L-tryptophan (Trp) depletion and kynurenine (Kyn) accumulation in the local tumor microenvironment, suppressing effector T cells and hyperactivating regulatory T cells (Treg). Navoximod is an investigational small-molecule inhibitor of IDO1. This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of navoximod in combination with atezolizumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Patients and Methods: The study consisted of a 3 þ 3 dose-escalation stage (n ¼ 66) and a tumor-specific expansion stage (n ¼ 92). Navoximod was given orally every 12 hours continuously for 21 consecutive days of each cycle with the exception of cycle 1, where navoximod administration started on day 1 to characterize pharmacokinetics. Atezolizumab was administered by intravenous infusion 1,200 mg every 3 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. Results: Patients (n ¼ 157) received navoximod at 6 dose levels (50–1,000 mg) in combination with atezolizumab. The maximum administered dose was 1,000 mg twice daily; the MTD was not reached. Navoximod demonstrated a linear pharmacokinetic profile, and plasma Kyn generally decreased with increasing doses of navoximod. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (22%), rash (22%), and chromaturia (20%). Activity was observed at all dose levels in various tumor types (melanoma, pancreatic, prostate, ovarian, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, cervical, neural sheath, non–small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial bladder cancer): 6 (9%) dose-escalation patients achieved partial response, and 10 (11%) expansion patients achieved partial response or complete response. Conclusions: The combination of navoximod and atezolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics for patients with advanced cancer. Although activity was observed, there was no clear evidence of benefit from adding navoximod to atezolizumab.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062663076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2740
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2740
M3 - Article
C2 - 30770348
AN - SCOPUS:85062663076
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 25
SP - 3220
EP - 3228
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 11
ER -