TY - JOUR
T1 - Population exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses for rucaparib in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma from Study 10 and ARIEL2
AU - Konecny, Gottfried E.
AU - Oza, Amit M.
AU - Tinker, Anna V.
AU - Oaknin, Ana
AU - Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie
AU - Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
AU - Aghajanian, Carol
AU - Coleman, Robert L.
AU - O'Malley, David M.
AU - Leary, Alexandra
AU - Chen, Lee may
AU - Provencher, Diane
AU - Ma, Ling
AU - Brenton, James D.
AU - Castro, Cesar
AU - Green, Michelle
AU - Simmons, Andrew D.
AU - Beltman, Jeri
AU - Harding, Thomas
AU - Lin, Kevin K.
AU - Goble, Sandra
AU - Maloney, Lara
AU - Kristeleit, Rebecca S.
AU - McNeish, Iain A.
AU - Swisher, Elizabeth M.
AU - Xiao, Jim J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate correlations between rucaparib exposure and selected efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma using pooled data from Study 10 and ARIEL2. Methods: Efficacy analyses were limited to patients with carcinomas harboring a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who had received ≥2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received ≥1 rucaparib dose. Steady-state daily area under the concentration-time curve (AUCss) and maximum concentration (Cmax,ss) for rucaparib were calculated for each patient and averaged by actual dose received over time (AUCavg,ss and Cmax,avg,ss) using a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model. Results: Rucaparib exposure was dose-proportional and not associated with baseline patient weight. In the exposure-efficacy analyses (n = 121), AUCavg,ss was positively associated with independent radiology review-assessed RECIST response in the subgroup of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease (n = 75, p = 0.017). In the exposure-safety analyses (n = 393, 40 mg once daily to 840 mg twice daily [BID] starting doses), most patients received a 600 mg BID rucaparib starting dose, with 27% and 21% receiving 1 or ≥2 dose reductions, respectively. Cmax,ss was significantly correlated with grade ≥2 serum creatinine increase, grade ≥3 alanine transaminase/aspartate transaminase increase, platelet decrease, fatigue/asthenia, and maximal hemoglobin decrease (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The exposure-response analyses provide support for the approved starting dose of rucaparib 600 mg BID for maximum clinical benefit with subsequent dose modification only following the occurrence of a treatment-emergent adverse event in patients with BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian carcinoma.
AB - Objective: To evaluate correlations between rucaparib exposure and selected efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma using pooled data from Study 10 and ARIEL2. Methods: Efficacy analyses were limited to patients with carcinomas harboring a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who had received ≥2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received ≥1 rucaparib dose. Steady-state daily area under the concentration-time curve (AUCss) and maximum concentration (Cmax,ss) for rucaparib were calculated for each patient and averaged by actual dose received over time (AUCavg,ss and Cmax,avg,ss) using a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model. Results: Rucaparib exposure was dose-proportional and not associated with baseline patient weight. In the exposure-efficacy analyses (n = 121), AUCavg,ss was positively associated with independent radiology review-assessed RECIST response in the subgroup of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease (n = 75, p = 0.017). In the exposure-safety analyses (n = 393, 40 mg once daily to 840 mg twice daily [BID] starting doses), most patients received a 600 mg BID rucaparib starting dose, with 27% and 21% receiving 1 or ≥2 dose reductions, respectively. Cmax,ss was significantly correlated with grade ≥2 serum creatinine increase, grade ≥3 alanine transaminase/aspartate transaminase increase, platelet decrease, fatigue/asthenia, and maximal hemoglobin decrease (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The exposure-response analyses provide support for the approved starting dose of rucaparib 600 mg BID for maximum clinical benefit with subsequent dose modification only following the occurrence of a treatment-emergent adverse event in patients with BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian carcinoma.
KW - Efficacy
KW - Exposure
KW - Ovarian carcinoma
KW - Pharmacokinetics
KW - Rucaparib
KW - Safety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103030410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 33752918
AN - SCOPUS:85103030410
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 161
SP - 668
EP - 675
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 3
ER -