Prognostic factors for response and overall survival in 282 patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine

Raphael Itzykson, Sylvain Thépot, Bruno Quesnel, Francois Dreyfus, Odile Beyne-Rauzy, Pascal Turlure, Norbert Vey, Christian Recher, Caroline Dartigeas, Laurence Legros, Jacques Delaunay, Célia Salanoubat, Sorin Visanica, Aspasia Stamatoullas, Francoise Isnard, Anne Marfaing-Koka, Stephane De Botton, Youcef Chelghoum, Anne Laure Taksin, Isabelle PlantierShanti Ame, Simone Boehrer, Claude Gardin, C. L. Beach, Lionel Adès, Pierre Fenaux

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    359 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Prognostic factors for response and survival in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients treated with azacitidine (AZA) remain largely unknown. Two hundred eighty-two consecutive high or intermediate-2 risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients received AZA in a compassionate, patient-named program. Diagnosis was RA/RARS/RCMD in 4%, RAEB-1 in 20%, RAEB-2 in 54%, and RAEB-t (AML with 21%-30% marrow blasts) in 22%. Cytogenetic risk was good in 31%, intermediate in 17%, and poor in 47%. Patients received AZA for a median of 6 cycles (1-52). Previous low-dose cytosine arabinoside treatment (P = .009), bone marrow blasts > 15% (P = .004), and abnormal karyotype (P = .03) independently predicted lower response rates. Complex karyotype predicted shorter responses (P = .0003). Performance status ≥ 2, intermediate- and poor-risk cytogenetics, presence of circulating blasts, and red blood cell transfusion dependency ≥ 4 units/8 weeks (all P < 10-4) independently predicted poorer overall survival (OS). A prognostic score based on those factors discriminated 3 risk groups with median OS not reached, 15.0 and 6.1 months, respectively (P < 10-4). This prognostic score was validated in an independent set of patients receiving AZA in the AZA-001 trial (P = .003). Achievement of hematological improvement in patients who did not obtain complete or partial remission was associated with improved OS (P < 10-4). In conclusion, routine tests can identify subgroups of patients with distinct prognosis with AZA treatment.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)403-411
    Number of pages9
    JournalBlood
    Volume117
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Jan 2011

    Cite this