Psychological distress in the academic population and its association with sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: Results from a large multicenter Italian study

Marco Fornili, Davide Petri, Carmen Berrocal, Giuseppe Fiorentino, Fulvio Ricceri, Alessandra MacCiotta, Andreina Bruno, Domenica Farinella, Michela Baccini, Gianluca Severi, Laura Baglietto

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Measures implemented in many countries to contain the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a change in lifestyle with unpredictable consequences on physical and mental health. We aimed at identifying the variables associated with psychological distress during the lockdown between April and May 2020 in the Italian academic population. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional online survey (IO CONTO 2020) within five Italian universities. Among about 240,000 individuals invited to participate through institutional communications, 18 120 filled the questionnaire. Psychological distress was measured by the selfadministered Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The covariates collected included demographic and lifestyle characteristics, trust in government, doctors and scientists. Associations of covariates with influenza-like symptoms or positive COVID-19 test and with psychological distress were assessed by multiple regression models at the local level; a meta-Analysis of the results was then performed. Severe levels of anxiety or depression were reported by 20% of the sample and were associated with being a student or having a lower income, irrespective of their health condition and worries about contracting the virus. The probability of being severely anxious or depressed also depended on physical activity: compared to those never exercising, the highest OR being for those who stopped during lockdown (1.53; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.84) and the lowest for those who continued (0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.95). Up to 21% of severe cases of anxiety or depression might have been avoided if during lockdown participants had continued to exercise as before. Socioeconomic insecurity contributes to increase mental problems related to the COVID-19 pandemic and to the measures to contain it. Maintaining or introducing an adequate level of physical activity is likely to mitigate such detrimental effects. Promoting safe practice of physical activity should remain a public health priority to reduce health risks during the pandemic.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0248370
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Volume16
    Issue number3 March
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2021

    Cite this