Radiographic progression with nonrising PSA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of PREVAIL

A. H. Bryce, J. J. Alumkal, A. Armstrong, C. S. Higano, P. Iversen, C. N. Sternberg, D. Rathkopf, Y. Loriot, J. De Bono, B. Tombal, S. Abhyankar, P. Lin, A. Krivoshik, D. Phung, T. M. Beer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    72 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Advanced prostate cancer is a phenotypically diverse disease that evolves through multiple clinical courses. PSA level is the most widely used parameter for disease monitoring, but it has well-recognized limitations. Unlike in clinical trials, in practice, clinicians may rely on PSA monitoring alone to determine disease status on therapy. This approach has not been adequately tested. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic men (n=872) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were treated with the androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide in the PREVAIL study were analyzed post hoc for rising versus nonrising PSA (empirically defined as 41.05 vs < 1.05 times the PSA level from 3 months earlier) at the time of radiographic progression. Clinical characteristics and disease outcomes were compared between the rising and nonrising PSA groups. RESULTS: Of 265 PREVAIL patients with radiographic progression and evaluable PSA levels on the enzalutamide arm, nearly one-quarter had a nonrising PSA. Median progression-free survival in this cohort was 8.3 months versus 11.1 months in the rising PSA cohort (hazard ratio 1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.23); overall survival was similar between the two groups, although less than half of patients in either group were still at risk at 24 months. Baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Non-rising PSA at radiographic progression is a common phenomenon in mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide. As restaging in advanced prostate cancer patients is often guided by increases in PSA levels, our results demonstrate that disease progression on enzalutamide can occur without rising PSA levels. Therefore, a disease monitoring strategy that includes imaging not entirely reliant on serial serum PSA measurement may more accurately identify disease progression.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)221-227
    Number of pages7
    JournalProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

    Cite this