TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Failing First-Line Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy Stratified by VeriStrat Good versus VeriStrat Poor. The European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) EMPHASIS-lung Trial
AU - EMPHASIS-lung Collaborative Group
AU - Peters, Solange
AU - Stahel, Rolf A.
AU - Dafni, Urania
AU - Ponce Aix, Santiago
AU - Massutí, Bartomeu
AU - Gautschi, Oliver
AU - Coate, Linda
AU - López Martín, Ana
AU - van Heemst, Robbert
AU - Berghmans, Thierry
AU - Meldgaard, Peter
AU - Cobo Dols, Manuel
AU - Garde Noguera, Javier
AU - Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra
AU - Rauch, Daniel
AU - Mark, Michael T.
AU - Cuffe, Sinead
AU - Biesma, Bonne
AU - van Henten, Arjen M.J.
AU - Juan Vidal, Óscar
AU - Palmero Sanchez, Ramón
AU - Villa Guzmán, José Carlos
AU - Collado Martin, Ricardo
AU - Peralta, Sergio
AU - Insa, Amelia
AU - Summers, Yvonne
AU - Láng, István
AU - Horgan, Anne
AU - Ciardiello, Fortunato
AU - de Hosson, Sander
AU - Pieterman, Remge
AU - Groen, Harry J.M.
AU - van den Berg, Paul M.
AU - Zielinski, Christoph C.
AU - Chittazhathu Kurian Kuruvilla, Yojena
AU - Gasca-Ruchti, Adriana
AU - Kassapian, Marie
AU - Novello, Silvia
AU - Torri, Valter
AU - Tsourti, Zoi
AU - Gregorc, Vanesa
AU - Smit, Egbert F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Introduction Docetaxel and erlotinib are registered second-line treatments for wild-type EGFR NSCLC. Previous studies suggested a predictive value of the VeriStrat test in second-line therapy of NSCLC, classifying patients as either VeriStrat good or VeriStrat poor. EMPHASIS-lung aimed at exploring this predictive effect in patients with squamous cell NSCLC. The trial closed prematurely because of low accrual and results from other trials. Our analysis includes an exploratory combined analysis with results from the PROSE trial. Methods EMPHASIS-lung was a randomized phase III multicenter trial exploring the differential effect of second-line erlotinib versus docetaxel on progression-free survival (PFS) in VeriStrat good versus VeriStrat poor patients with squamous cell NSCLC. Results A total of 80 patients were randomized, with 72.5% categorized as VeriStrat good. Patient characteristics were balanced between VeriStrat status and treatment groups. The median PFS times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 4.1 and 1.6 months, respectively, versus 1.9 and 2.1 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. The median overall survival (OS) times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 7.8 and 8.4 months, respectively, and 4.4 and 5.2 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. An additional exploratory analysis was performed; in it, 47 patients from the squamous cell subgroup of PROSE were included in a combined analysis, contributing with 45 PFS and 41 OS events. Conclusions The final analysis of EMPHASIS-lung did not show a differential effect on PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel stratified by VeriStrat status. Similarly, in the combined analysis, no significant treatment by VeriStrat status interaction was observed (interaction p = 0.24 for PFS and 0.45 for OS, stratified by study).
AB - Introduction Docetaxel and erlotinib are registered second-line treatments for wild-type EGFR NSCLC. Previous studies suggested a predictive value of the VeriStrat test in second-line therapy of NSCLC, classifying patients as either VeriStrat good or VeriStrat poor. EMPHASIS-lung aimed at exploring this predictive effect in patients with squamous cell NSCLC. The trial closed prematurely because of low accrual and results from other trials. Our analysis includes an exploratory combined analysis with results from the PROSE trial. Methods EMPHASIS-lung was a randomized phase III multicenter trial exploring the differential effect of second-line erlotinib versus docetaxel on progression-free survival (PFS) in VeriStrat good versus VeriStrat poor patients with squamous cell NSCLC. Results A total of 80 patients were randomized, with 72.5% categorized as VeriStrat good. Patient characteristics were balanced between VeriStrat status and treatment groups. The median PFS times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 4.1 and 1.6 months, respectively, versus 1.9 and 2.1 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. The median overall survival (OS) times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 7.8 and 8.4 months, respectively, and 4.4 and 5.2 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. An additional exploratory analysis was performed; in it, 47 patients from the squamous cell subgroup of PROSE were included in a combined analysis, contributing with 45 PFS and 41 OS events. Conclusions The final analysis of EMPHASIS-lung did not show a differential effect on PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel stratified by VeriStrat status. Similarly, in the combined analysis, no significant treatment by VeriStrat status interaction was observed (interaction p = 0.24 for PFS and 0.45 for OS, stratified by study).
KW - Docetaxel
KW - ETOP
KW - Erlotinib
KW - NSCLC
KW - Squamous
KW - VeriStrat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015922705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 28017787
AN - SCOPUS:85015922705
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 12
SP - 752
EP - 762
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 4
ER -