Real-world clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early relapsed triple-negative breast cancer from the ESME national cohort

Thomas Grinda, Alison Antoine, William Jacot, Paul Henri Cottu, Thibault de la Motte Rouge, Jean Sébastien Frenel, Audrey Mailliez, Florence Dalenc, Anthony Goncalves, Florian Clatot, Marie Ange Mouret Reynier, Christelle Levy, Jean Marc Ferrero, Isabelle Desmoulins, Lionel Uwer, Thierry Petit, Christelle Jouannaud, Monica Arnedos, Michaël Chevrot, Coralie CourtinardOlivier Tredan, Etienne Brain, David Pérol, Barbara Pistilli, Suzette Delaloge

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Early metastatic relapse of triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) after anthracyclins and/or taxanes based (A/T) primary treatment represents a highly aggressive cancer situation requiring urgent characterisation and handling. Epidemio-Strategy-Medico-Economical-Metastatic Breast Cancer (ESME-MBC) database, a multicenter, national, observational cohort (NCT03275311) provides recent data on this entity. Methods: All ESME patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2020 with mTNBC occurring as a relapse after a systemic neoadjuvant/adjuvant taxane and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy were included. Early relapses were defined by a metastatic diagnosis up to 12 months of the end of neo/adjuvant A/T chemotherapy. We assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free-survival under first-line treatment (PFS1) by early versus late relapse (≥12 months). Results: Patients with early relapse (N = 881, 46%) were younger and had a larger tumour burden at primary diagnosis than those with late relapses (N = 1045). Early relapse rates appeared stable over time. Median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI 9.3–10.9) in patients with early relapse versus 17.1 months (95% CI 15.7–18.2) in those with late relapse (adjusted hazard-ratio (aHR): 1.92 (95% CI 1.73–2.13); p < 0.001). The median PFS1 was respectively 3.1 months (95% CI 2.9–3.4) and 5.3 months (95% CI 5.1–5.8); (aHR: 1.66; [95% CI 1.50–1.83]; p < 0.001). Among early relapsed patients, a higher number of metastatic sites, visceral disease but not treatment types, were independently associated with a poorer OS. Conclusion: These real-world data provide strong evidence on the dismal prognosis, higher treatment resistance and major unmet medical need associated with early relapsed mTNBC. Database registration: clinicaltrials.gov

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number112935
    JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
    Volume189
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2023

    Keywords

    • Breast cancer
    • ESME cohort
    • Overall survival
    • Real-world data
    • Triple-negative breast cancer

    Cite this