Second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

Fabrice Barlési, William Jacot, Philippe Astoul, Jean Louis Pujol

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, most will resist or relapse after first-line chemotherapy. As a result, second-line therapy has been a major focus for clinical research. Materials and methods: A systematic review was carried out from 1996 to February 2005. Results: Second-line chemotherapy provides pre-treated NSCLC patients with a clear survival advantage. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks is the present standard second-line chemotherapy. Despite promising results regarding efficacy and toxicity in phase III studies, a docetaxel weekly schedule could not be recommended. Pemetrexed recently emerged as an alternative with similar efficacy and less toxicity. Although the combination of two drugs was not associated with a survival benefit when compared with single-agent chemotherapy, such regimens induced a dramatic increase in toxicities and therefore mono-chemotherapy remains the standard as second-line therapy. Finally, few new agents were reported with better results than those used previously and clinical research on second-line therapy currently focuses on combinations with targeted therapies. Conclusion: Second-line chemotherapy offers NSCLC patients a small but significant survival improvement. However, this field of clinical research needs further investigations in order to answer certain remaining questions especially concerning targeted therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-172
Number of pages14
JournalLung Cancer
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy
  • Docetaxel
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Pemetrexed
  • Second-line
  • Targeted therapy
  • Weekly schedule

Cite this