TY - JOUR
T1 - Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection
AU - Canoy, Reynand Jay
AU - Shmakova, Anna
AU - Karpukhina, Anna
AU - Lomov, Nikolai
AU - Tiukacheva, Eugenia
AU - Kozhevnikova, Yana
AU - André, Franck
AU - Germini, Diego
AU - Vassetzky, Yegor
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Cancer.
PY - 2023/9/1
Y1 - 2023/9/1
N2 - Most cancer-related chromosomal translocations appear to be cell type specific. It is currently unknown why different chromosomal translocations occur in different cells. This can be due to either the occurrence of particular translocations in specific cell types or adaptive survival advantage conferred by translocations only in specific cells. We experimentally addressed this question by double-strand break (DSB) induction at MYC, IGH, AML and ETO loci in the same cell to generate chromosomal translocations in different cell lineages. Our results show that any translocation can potentially arise in any cell type. We have analyzed different factors that could affect the frequency of the translocations, and only the spatial proximity between gene loci after the DSB induction correlated with the resulting translocation frequency, supporting the ‘breakage-first’ model. Furthermore, upon long-term culture of cells with the generated chromosomal translocations, only oncogenic MYC–IGH and AML–ETO translocations persisted over a 60-day period. Overall, the results suggest that chromosomal translocation can be generated after DSB induction in any type of cell, but whether the cell with the translocation would persist in a cell population depends on the cell type-specific selective survival advantage that the chromosomal translocation confers to the cell.
AB - Most cancer-related chromosomal translocations appear to be cell type specific. It is currently unknown why different chromosomal translocations occur in different cells. This can be due to either the occurrence of particular translocations in specific cell types or adaptive survival advantage conferred by translocations only in specific cells. We experimentally addressed this question by double-strand break (DSB) induction at MYC, IGH, AML and ETO loci in the same cell to generate chromosomal translocations in different cell lineages. Our results show that any translocation can potentially arise in any cell type. We have analyzed different factors that could affect the frequency of the translocations, and only the spatial proximity between gene loci after the DSB induction correlated with the resulting translocation frequency, supporting the ‘breakage-first’ model. Furthermore, upon long-term culture of cells with the generated chromosomal translocations, only oncogenic MYC–IGH and AML–ETO translocations persisted over a 60-day period. Overall, the results suggest that chromosomal translocation can be generated after DSB induction in any type of cell, but whether the cell with the translocation would persist in a cell population depends on the cell type-specific selective survival advantage that the chromosomal translocation confers to the cell.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174298800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/narcan/zcad049
DO - 10.1093/narcan/zcad049
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85174298800
SN - 2632-8674
VL - 5
JO - NAR Cancer
JF - NAR Cancer
IS - 3
M1 - zcad049
ER -