TY - JOUR
T1 - Subtype-Specific Analyses Reveal Infiltrative Basal Cell Carcinomas Are Highly Interactive with their Environment
AU - Villani, Rehan
AU - Murigneux, Valentine
AU - Alexis, Josue
AU - Sim, Seen Ling
AU - Wagels, Michael
AU - Saunders, Nicholas
AU - Soyer, H. Peter
AU - Parmentier, Laurent
AU - Nikolaev, Sergey
AU - Fink, J. Lynn
AU - Roy, Edwige
AU - Khosrotehrani, Kiarash
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Little is known regarding the molecular differences between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) subtypes, despite clearly distinct phenotypes and clinical outcomes. In particular, infiltrative BCCs have poorer clinical outcomes in terms of response to therapy and propensity for dissemination. In this project, we aimed to use exome sequencing and RNA sequencing to identify somatic mutations and molecular pathways leading to infiltrative BCCs. Using whole-exome sequencing of 36 BCC samples (eight infiltrative) combined with previously reported exome data (58 samples), we determine that infiltrative BCCs do not contain a distinct somatic variant profile and carry classical UV-induced mutational signatures. RNA sequencing on both datasets revealed key differentially expressed genes, such as POSTN and WISP1, suggesting increased integrin and Wnt signaling. Immunostaining for periostin and WISP1 clearly distinguished infiltrative BCCs, and nuclear β-catenin staining patterns further validated the resulting increase in Wnt signaling in infiltrative BCCs. Of significant interest, in BCCs with mixed morphology, infiltrative areas expressed WISP1, whereas nodular areas did not, supporting a continuum between subtypes. In conclusion, infiltrative BCCs do not differ in their genomic alteration in terms of initiating mutations. They display a specific type of interaction with the extracellular matrix environment regulating Wnt signaling.
AB - Little is known regarding the molecular differences between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) subtypes, despite clearly distinct phenotypes and clinical outcomes. In particular, infiltrative BCCs have poorer clinical outcomes in terms of response to therapy and propensity for dissemination. In this project, we aimed to use exome sequencing and RNA sequencing to identify somatic mutations and molecular pathways leading to infiltrative BCCs. Using whole-exome sequencing of 36 BCC samples (eight infiltrative) combined with previously reported exome data (58 samples), we determine that infiltrative BCCs do not contain a distinct somatic variant profile and carry classical UV-induced mutational signatures. RNA sequencing on both datasets revealed key differentially expressed genes, such as POSTN and WISP1, suggesting increased integrin and Wnt signaling. Immunostaining for periostin and WISP1 clearly distinguished infiltrative BCCs, and nuclear β-catenin staining patterns further validated the resulting increase in Wnt signaling in infiltrative BCCs. Of significant interest, in BCCs with mixed morphology, infiltrative areas expressed WISP1, whereas nodular areas did not, supporting a continuum between subtypes. In conclusion, infiltrative BCCs do not differ in their genomic alteration in terms of initiating mutations. They display a specific type of interaction with the extracellular matrix environment regulating Wnt signaling.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105498556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jid.2021.02.760
DO - 10.1016/j.jid.2021.02.760
M3 - Article
C2 - 33865912
AN - SCOPUS:85105498556
SN - 0022-202X
VL - 141
SP - 2380
EP - 2390
JO - Journal of Investigative Dermatology
JF - Journal of Investigative Dermatology
IS - 10
ER -