TY - JOUR
T1 - Sunitinib Alone or After Nephrectomy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
T2 - Is There Still a Role for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy?[Formula presented]
AU - Méjean, Arnaud
AU - Ravaud, Alain
AU - Thezenas, Simon
AU - Chevreau, Christine
AU - Bensalah, Karim
AU - Geoffrois, Lionnel
AU - Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine
AU - Cormier, Luc
AU - Lang, Hervé
AU - Guy, Laurent
AU - Gravis, Gwenaelle
AU - Rolland, Frederic
AU - Linassier, Claude
AU - Lechevallier, Eric
AU - Oudard, Stephane
AU - Laguerre, Brigitte
AU - Gross-Goupil, Marine
AU - Bernhard, Jean Christophe
AU - Colas, Sandra
AU - Albiges, Laurence
AU - Lebret, Thierry
AU - Treluyer, Jean Marc
AU - Timsit, Marc Olivier
AU - Escudier, Bernard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Association of Urology
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Background: The CARMENA trial in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) demonstrated that treatment with sunitinib alone was noninferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by sunitinib (nephrectomy⬜sunitinib). Objective: The objective of this study was to provide updated overall survival (OS) outcomes of CARMENA and assess whether some subgroups may still benefit from upfront CN. Design, setting, and participants: CARMENA was a phase III trial in 450 patients with mRCC enrolled from 2009 to 2017. Intervention: Patients in the intention-to-treat population received nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (standard of care [SOC]; n = 226) or sunitinib alone (n = 224). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Primary endpoint was OS, assessed using an updated data cut-off (October 2018; median OS event-free follow-up, 36.6 mo). Patients were reclassified by risk using International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. Results and limitations: Sunitinib alone was noninferior to nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.79⬜1.19; p = 0.8) and demonstrated longer median OS (19.8 mo vs 15.6 mo, respectively). For patients with two or more IMDC risk factors, OS was significantly longer with sunitinib alone than with nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (31.2 mo vs 17.6 mo, respectively; HR, 0.65; p = 0.03). For patients with one IMDC risk factor, OS was longer for nephrectomy⬜sunitinib versus sunitinib alone although not significantly (31.4 mo vs 25.2 mo; HR, 1.30; p = 0.2). The post hoc nature of the subgroup analyses may limit their interpretation. Conclusions: Sunitinib alone was noninferior compared with nephrectomy⬜sunitinib, suggesting that CN should not be considered SOC in patients with mRCC requiring systemic treatment. Certain subgroups, including patients with one IMDC risk factor, may still benefit from upfront CN. Patient summary: We assessed the survival of patients with metastatic kidney cancer in a clinical trial. Patients treated with sunitinib on its own had the same survival as patients who had surgery before sunitinib treatment. We conclude that surgery may not be necessary for some patients with metastatic kidney cancer.
AB - Background: The CARMENA trial in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) demonstrated that treatment with sunitinib alone was noninferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by sunitinib (nephrectomy⬜sunitinib). Objective: The objective of this study was to provide updated overall survival (OS) outcomes of CARMENA and assess whether some subgroups may still benefit from upfront CN. Design, setting, and participants: CARMENA was a phase III trial in 450 patients with mRCC enrolled from 2009 to 2017. Intervention: Patients in the intention-to-treat population received nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (standard of care [SOC]; n = 226) or sunitinib alone (n = 224). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Primary endpoint was OS, assessed using an updated data cut-off (October 2018; median OS event-free follow-up, 36.6 mo). Patients were reclassified by risk using International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. Results and limitations: Sunitinib alone was noninferior to nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.79⬜1.19; p = 0.8) and demonstrated longer median OS (19.8 mo vs 15.6 mo, respectively). For patients with two or more IMDC risk factors, OS was significantly longer with sunitinib alone than with nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (31.2 mo vs 17.6 mo, respectively; HR, 0.65; p = 0.03). For patients with one IMDC risk factor, OS was longer for nephrectomy⬜sunitinib versus sunitinib alone although not significantly (31.4 mo vs 25.2 mo; HR, 1.30; p = 0.2). The post hoc nature of the subgroup analyses may limit their interpretation. Conclusions: Sunitinib alone was noninferior compared with nephrectomy⬜sunitinib, suggesting that CN should not be considered SOC in patients with mRCC requiring systemic treatment. Certain subgroups, including patients with one IMDC risk factor, may still benefit from upfront CN. Patient summary: We assessed the survival of patients with metastatic kidney cancer in a clinical trial. Patients treated with sunitinib on its own had the same survival as patients who had surgery before sunitinib treatment. We conclude that surgery may not be necessary for some patients with metastatic kidney cancer.
KW - Cytoreductive nephrectomy
KW - Noninferiority
KW - Sunitinib
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108830236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 34187771
AN - SCOPUS:85108830236
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 80
SP - 417
EP - 424
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 4
ER -