TY - JOUR
T1 - The Development of Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate (ICECaP)
AU - ICECaP Working Group
AU - Andren, Ove
AU - Armstrong, John
AU - Berry, Donald
AU - Bolla, Michel
AU - Buyse, Marc
AU - Chowdhury, Simon
AU - Clarke, Noel
AU - Collette, Laurence
AU - Cooperberg, Matthew
AU - Denham, Jim
AU - Eisenberger, Mario
AU - Dignam, James
AU - Fizazi, Karim
AU - Freidlin, Boris
AU - Gleave, Martin
AU - Habibian, Muriel
AU - Halabi, Susan
AU - Hayes, Julia
AU - James, Nick
AU - Jarow, Jonathan
AU - Keating, Nancy
AU - Kantoff, Philip
AU - Kelloff, Gary
AU - Klotz, Laurence
AU - Li, Suhui
AU - Lukka, Himu
AU - Mahal, Brandon
AU - Mason, Malcolm
AU - Miyahara, Andrea
AU - Nakabayashi, Mari
AU - Parulekar, Wendy
AU - Philipson, Tomas
AU - Regan, Meredith
AU - Sandler, Howard
AU - Sartor, Oliver
AU - Scardino, Peter
AU - Scher, Howard
AU - Simon, Richard
AU - Simons, Jonathan
AU - Small, Eric
AU - Soule, Howard
AU - Sweeney, Christopher
AU - Sydes, Matthew
AU - Tangen, Catherine
AU - Thompson, Ian
AU - Tombal, Bertrand
AU - Widmark, Anders
AU - Wiegel, Thomas
AU - Williams, Scott
AU - Xie, Wanling
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - New systemic therapies have prolonged the lives of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Use of these therapies in the adjuvant setting when the disease may be micrometastatic and potentially more sensitive to therapies may decrease mortality from prostate cancer. However, the conduct of adjuvant prostate cancer clinical trials is hampered by taking longer than a decade to reach the meaningful endpoint of overall survival (OS) and the fact that many men never die from prostate cancer, even if they relapse. A validated intermediate clinical endpoint (ICE) in prostate cancer that is a robust surrogate for OS has yet to be defined. This paper details the plans, process, and progress of the international Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate (ICECaP) working group to pool individual patient data from all available clinical trials of radiation or prostatectomy for localized disease and conduct the requisite analyses to determine whether an ICE can be identified. This paper further details the challenges and the a priori statistical analytical plans and strategies to define an ICE for adjuvant prostate cancer clinical trials. In addition, a brief review of the health economic analyses to model the benefits to patients, society and manufacturers is detailed. If successful, the results from this work will provide a robust surrogate for OS that will expedite the design and conduct of future adjuvant therapy trials using new agents that have proven activity in mCRPC. Moreover, it will also define the health economic benefits to patients and societies.
AB - New systemic therapies have prolonged the lives of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Use of these therapies in the adjuvant setting when the disease may be micrometastatic and potentially more sensitive to therapies may decrease mortality from prostate cancer. However, the conduct of adjuvant prostate cancer clinical trials is hampered by taking longer than a decade to reach the meaningful endpoint of overall survival (OS) and the fact that many men never die from prostate cancer, even if they relapse. A validated intermediate clinical endpoint (ICE) in prostate cancer that is a robust surrogate for OS has yet to be defined. This paper details the plans, process, and progress of the international Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate (ICECaP) working group to pool individual patient data from all available clinical trials of radiation or prostatectomy for localized disease and conduct the requisite analyses to determine whether an ICE can be identified. This paper further details the challenges and the a priori statistical analytical plans and strategies to define an ICE for adjuvant prostate cancer clinical trials. In addition, a brief review of the health economic analyses to model the benefits to patients, society and manufacturers is detailed. If successful, the results from this work will provide a robust surrogate for OS that will expedite the design and conduct of future adjuvant therapy trials using new agents that have proven activity in mCRPC. Moreover, it will also define the health economic benefits to patients and societies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131100843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djv261
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djv261
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26409187
AN - SCOPUS:85131100843
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 107
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 12
M1 - djv261
ER -