TY - JOUR
T1 - Tumor growth rate is an early indicator of antitumor drug activity in phase i clinical trials AC
AU - Ferté, Charles
AU - Fernandez, Marianna
AU - Hollebecque, Antoine
AU - Koscielny, Serge
AU - Levy, Antonin
AU - Massard, Christophe
AU - Balheda, Rastislav
AU - Bot, Brian
AU - Gomez-Roca, Carlos
AU - Dromain, Clarisse
AU - Ammari, Samy
AU - Soria, Jean Charles
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Purpose: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) evaluation does not take into account the pretreatment tumor kinetics and may provide incomplete information about experimental drug activity. Tumor growth rate (TGR) allows for a dynamic and quantitative assessment of the tumor kinetics. HowTGR varies along the introduction of experimental therapeutics and is associated with outcome in phase I patients remains unknown. Experimental Design: Medical records from all patients (N = 253) prospectively treated in 20 phase I trials were analyzed. TGR was computed during the pretreatment period (reference) and the experimental period. Associations between TGR, standard prognostic scores [Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score], and outcome [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] were computed (multivariate analysis). Results: We observed a reduction of TGR between the reference versus experimental periods (38% vs. 4.4%; P < 0.00001). Although most patients were classified as stable disease (65%) or progressive disease (25%) by RECIST at the first evaluation, 82%and65%of them exhibited a decrease in TGR, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, only the decrease of TGR was associated with PFS (P = 0.004), whereas theRMHscore was the only variable associated with OS (P= 0.0008). Only the investigated regimens delivered were associated with a decrease of TGR (P < 0.00001, multivariate analysis). Computing TGR profiles across different clinical trials reveals specific patterns of antitumor activity. Conclusions: Exploring TGR in phase I patients is simple and provides clinically relevant information: (i) an early and subtle assessment of signs of antitumor activity; (ii) independent association with PFS; and (iii) it reveals drug-specific profiles, suggesting potential utility for guiding the further development of the investigational drugs. Clin Cancer Res; 20(1); 246-52.
AB - Purpose: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) evaluation does not take into account the pretreatment tumor kinetics and may provide incomplete information about experimental drug activity. Tumor growth rate (TGR) allows for a dynamic and quantitative assessment of the tumor kinetics. HowTGR varies along the introduction of experimental therapeutics and is associated with outcome in phase I patients remains unknown. Experimental Design: Medical records from all patients (N = 253) prospectively treated in 20 phase I trials were analyzed. TGR was computed during the pretreatment period (reference) and the experimental period. Associations between TGR, standard prognostic scores [Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score], and outcome [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] were computed (multivariate analysis). Results: We observed a reduction of TGR between the reference versus experimental periods (38% vs. 4.4%; P < 0.00001). Although most patients were classified as stable disease (65%) or progressive disease (25%) by RECIST at the first evaluation, 82%and65%of them exhibited a decrease in TGR, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, only the decrease of TGR was associated with PFS (P = 0.004), whereas theRMHscore was the only variable associated with OS (P= 0.0008). Only the investigated regimens delivered were associated with a decrease of TGR (P < 0.00001, multivariate analysis). Computing TGR profiles across different clinical trials reveals specific patterns of antitumor activity. Conclusions: Exploring TGR in phase I patients is simple and provides clinically relevant information: (i) an early and subtle assessment of signs of antitumor activity; (ii) independent association with PFS; and (iii) it reveals drug-specific profiles, suggesting potential utility for guiding the further development of the investigational drugs. Clin Cancer Res; 20(1); 246-52.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892188435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2098
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2098
M3 - Article
C2 - 24240109
AN - SCOPUS:84892188435
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 20
SP - 246
EP - 252
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 1
ER -