évaluation comparative et objective de la production scientifique des services hospitaliers au sein de l'Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris: Analyse des scores SIGAPS

Purpose: To analyze the results of the bibliometric system (SIGAPS score) of scientific publications in the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) and to compare the scientific production among the various medical and surgical specialties of the academic hospitals of Paris. Methods: All the publications imported from Pubmed between 2006 and 2008 were included. The following data were taken into account and analysed: the hospital department of origin, the number of articles published, the number of full-time physicians, the SIGAPS score. Results: Thirty-eight thousand, seven hundred and nine publications were included. The departments were consisted of 747 full-time practitioners 5719 (1895 Professors [33.1%], 2772 Assistant Professors [48.4%] and 1052 fellows [18.4%]). The average number of full-time practitioner by department was 7.7 ± 6.7 (range 1-69). The average total number of articles published in a department was 51.8 ± 49.4 (range 1-453). The average SIGAPS score was more important in medicine than in surgery (621.2 ± 670.1 vs. 401 ± 382.2; P=0.01) but not the average number of article per practitioner (8.1 ± 8.3 vs. 6.6 ± 6.2; P=0.0797). The mean number of publication by full-time practitioner was 7.9 ± 7.8 (1-45), or an average of 2.7 ± 2.6 for each full-time practitioner each year. Conclusion: Academic hospitals in Paris have a reasonably scientific output but with a mean of 2.7 articles per full-time practitioner per year. No major differences between medical and surgical disciplines were observed.