18F-FLT and 18F-FDG positron emission tomography for the imaging of advanced well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine tumours

Francesco Giammarile, Claire Billotey, Catherine Lombard-Bohas, Didier Le Bars, Claire Bournaud, Sandrine Masson, Thomas Walter, Claire Houzard, Jean Yves Scoazec, Valérie Hervieu, Jean Philippe Vuillez, Catherine Cornu, Marc Janier, Françoise Borson-Chazot

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

14 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Purpose: Gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) endocrine tumours are a heterogenous group of tumours of variable localization and prognosis. It has been suggested that positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-[F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-FDG) may have a prognostic value and help to identify patients at risk of progression. [F]fluoro-3′-deoxy-3′-L- fluorothymidine (F-FLT) has been recently developed as a PET proliferation tracer. At present, there are no studies investigating its role in GEP. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the value of F-FLT-PET for the evaluation of GEP. Materials and methods: Ten patients with biopsy-proven locally advanced or metastasized, well-differentiated GEP neuroendocrine tumours were prospectively enroled and scheduled for F-FDG and F-FLT-PET. Images were compared with other conventional diagnostic procedures, namely computed tomography, ultrasound, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and with clinical and diagnostic follow-up. Results: Evaluation criteria were interpreted in terms of assumed presence of tumoral tissue. According to the patients status, FDG was positive in five out of the seven patients with stable disease and in two out of the three patients with progressive disease. No positive case was identified by F-FLT in either the primary or the metastatic tumour site, whatever the status of patients, and this was probably a reflection of the slow proliferation rate of tumours. Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that F-FLT-PET is not a suitable tracer for the evaluation of advanced well-differentiated GEP tumours. FDG showed good diagnostic performance but does not help to identify patients at risk of progression.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)91-97
Nombre de pages7
journalNuclear Medicine Communications
Volume32
Numéro de publication2
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 févr. 2011
Modification externeOui

Contient cette citation