A comparison of real-world data on adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III BRAF V600 mutated melanoma – Results of systematic literature research

Teresa Amaral, Lena Nanz, Lina Maria Serna Higuita, Paolo Ascierto, Carola Berking, Eva Muñoz Couselo, Marco Donia, Reinhard Dummer, Ralf Gutzmer, Axel Haushild, Mathilde Jalving, Rebecca Lee, Paul Lorigan, Ivan Marquez-Rodas, Olivier Michelin, Paul Nathan, Caroline Robert, Dirk Schadendorf, Pawel Sobczuk, Lukas FlatzUlrike Leiter, Claus Garbe

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    Résumé

    Background: Over the past decade, PD-1-based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors transformed melanoma treatment. Both are widely used in the adjuvant setting. However, for patients with a BRAF V600 mutation, the optimal adjuvant therapy remains unclear due to the lack of head-to-head comparison studies. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of real-world data on adjuvant therapy in stage III melanoma to determine the best option for patients with BRAF V600 mutations. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for TT and ICI using Digitizelt software. Results: Nine publications with 3625 patients were included. TT showed better relapse-free survival (RFS) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months than ICI. A similar trend was observed for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), with no apparent difference in overall survival. Conclusion: Real-world data suggest that adjuvant TT may be associated with better RFS and DMFS in stage III BRAF V600-mutated melanoma compared to ICI.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Numéro d'article115160
    journalEuropean Journal of Cancer
    Volume215
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 17 janv. 2025

    Contient cette citation