TY - JOUR
T1 - A phase II of gemcitabine combined with pazopanib followed by pazopanib maintenance, as second-line treatment in patients with advanced leiomyosarcomas
T2 - A unicancer French Sarcoma Group study (LMS03 study)
AU - Pautier, P.
AU - Penel, N.
AU - Ray-Coquard, I.
AU - Italiano, A.
AU - Bompas, E.
AU - Delcambre, C.
AU - Bay, J. O.
AU - Bertucci, F.
AU - Delaye, J.
AU - Chevreau, C.
AU - Cupissol, D.
AU - Bozec, L.
AU - Eymard, J. C.
AU - Saada, E.
AU - Isambert, N.
AU - Guillemet, C.
AU - Rios, M.
AU - Piperno-Neumann, S.
AU - Chenuc, G.
AU - Duffaud, F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Background: Options in second-line therapy after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for metastatic/advanced leiomyosarcoma include gemcitabine (G), trabectedin and pazopanib (P) monotherapy. Currently, no combination therapy is better than monotherapy. LMS03 is an open-label multicentre single-group phase II study designed to assess the efficacy and tolerance of G + P in the second-line setting. Patients and methods: Patients (pts), ECOG ≤2, with metastatic leiomyosarcomas (LMS) after first-line doxorubicin chemotherapy failure were eligible. Pts were treated with G 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 21 days (maximum eight cycles), in combination with oral daily P (800 mg), until disease progression/toxicity. 9-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was the primary endpoint. Inacceptable and promising 9-month PFS rates were defined, in the intent-to-treat population, as 32% and 44%. Results: 106 pts were included with a mean age of 59.8 years and an ECOG 0 in 63.5%; the primary tumour site was uterus in 61%. Pts were treated with P + G for a median of 3.8 mo, and P for a median of 4.2 mo. The 9-month PFS rate was 32.1% (95% CI 23.1–41.1). After a median follow-up of 14.2 months, the PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6–8.2), and the overall survival was 22.4 months (95% CI 16.9–26.5). The best response was 23.8%. The most frequent reported grade 3–4 adverse events were haematological. Conclusions: LMS03 failed to show that second-line therapy, with gemcitabine combined with pazopanib, followed by pazopanib alone, was beneficial for advanced LMS patients. Eudract N°2011-001308-36 and NCT01442662.
AB - Background: Options in second-line therapy after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for metastatic/advanced leiomyosarcoma include gemcitabine (G), trabectedin and pazopanib (P) monotherapy. Currently, no combination therapy is better than monotherapy. LMS03 is an open-label multicentre single-group phase II study designed to assess the efficacy and tolerance of G + P in the second-line setting. Patients and methods: Patients (pts), ECOG ≤2, with metastatic leiomyosarcomas (LMS) after first-line doxorubicin chemotherapy failure were eligible. Pts were treated with G 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 21 days (maximum eight cycles), in combination with oral daily P (800 mg), until disease progression/toxicity. 9-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was the primary endpoint. Inacceptable and promising 9-month PFS rates were defined, in the intent-to-treat population, as 32% and 44%. Results: 106 pts were included with a mean age of 59.8 years and an ECOG 0 in 63.5%; the primary tumour site was uterus in 61%. Pts were treated with P + G for a median of 3.8 mo, and P for a median of 4.2 mo. The 9-month PFS rate was 32.1% (95% CI 23.1–41.1). After a median follow-up of 14.2 months, the PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6–8.2), and the overall survival was 22.4 months (95% CI 16.9–26.5). The best response was 23.8%. The most frequent reported grade 3–4 adverse events were haematological. Conclusions: LMS03 failed to show that second-line therapy, with gemcitabine combined with pazopanib, followed by pazopanib alone, was beneficial for advanced LMS patients. Eudract N°2011-001308-36 and NCT01442662.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Leiomyosarcoma
KW - Maintenance therapy
KW - Metastatic disease
KW - Pazopanib
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076058558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.028
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 31835236
AN - SCOPUS:85076058558
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 125
SP - 31
EP - 37
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -