A systematic literature review of definitions and classification systems for radiotherapy innovation: A first step towards building a value-based assessment tool for radiation oncology

Miet Vandemaele, Marianne Aznar, Pierre Blanchard, Josep M. Borras, Michelle Leech, Ajay Aggarwal, Yolande Lievens

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Introduction: Timely access to radiotherapy innovations remains suboptimal, partly because there is no commonly agreed appraisal system suitable for the broad range of radiotherapy interventions. The Health Economics in Radiation Oncology (HERO) programme of ESTRO therefore engaged in building a radiotherapy-specific value-based framework. We report on a first step towards that aim, documenting the available definitions and classification systems for radiotherapy interventions. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out in Pubmed and Embase, following PRISMA methodology and using search terms on ‘innovation’, ‘radiotherapy’, ‘definition’ and ‘classification’. Data were extracted from articles that met prespecified inclusion criteria. Results: Out of 13,353 articles, 25 met the inclusion criteria, resulting in the identification of 7 definitions of innovation and 15 classification systems applicable to radiation oncology. Iterative appraisal divided the classification systems into two groups. A first group of 11 systems categorized innovations according to the perceived magnitude of innovation, typically ‘minor’ versus ‘major’. The remaining 4 systems categorised innovations according to radiotherapy-specific characteristics, such as the type of radiation equipment or radiobiological properties. Here, commonly used terms as ‘technique’ or ‘treatment’ were found to be used in different meanings. Discussion: There is no widely accepted definition or classification system for radiotherapy innovations. The data however suggest that unique properties of radiotherapy interventions can be used to categorise innovations in radiation oncology. Still, there remains a need for clear terminology denoting radiotherapy-specific characteristics. Conclusion: Building on this review, the ESTRO-HERO project will define what is required for a radiotherapy-specific value-based assessment tool.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Numéro d'article109602
    journalRadiotherapy and Oncology
    Volume183
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 juin 2023

    Contient cette citation