Abridged geriatric assessment is a better predictor of overall survival than the Karnofsky Performance Scale and Physical Performance Test in elderly patients with cancer

Objectives Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a complex and interdisciplinary approach to evaluate the health status of elderly patients. The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and Physical Performance Test (PPT) are less time-consuming tools that measure functional status. This study was designed to assess and compare abridged geriatric assessment (GA), KPS and PPT as predictive tools of mortality in elderly patients with cancer. Materials and Methods This prospective interventional study included all individuals aged > 70 years who were diagnosed with cancer during the study period. Subjects were interviewed directly using a procedure that included a clinical test and a questionnaire composed of the KPS, PPT and abridged GCA. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The log rank test was used to compare survival curves, and Cox's regression model (forward procedure) was used for multivariate survival analysis. Results One hundred patients were included in this study. Abridged GA was the only tool found to predict mortality [median OS for unfit patients (at least two impairments) 467 days vs 1030 days for fit patients; p = 0.04]. Patients defined as fit by mean PPT score (> 20) had worse median OS (560 vs 721 days); however, this difference was not significant (p = 0.488 on log rank). Although median OS did not differ significantly between patients with low (≤ 80) and high (> 80) KPS scores (467 and 795 days, respectively; p = 0.09), survival curves diverged after nearly 120 days of follow-up. Visual and hearing impairments were the only components of abridged GA of prognostic value. Conclusion Neither KPS nor PPT were shown to predict mortality in elderly patients with cancer whereas abridged GA was predictive. This study suggests a possible role for visual and hearing assessment as screening for patients requiring CGA.