TY - JOUR
T1 - Accelerated radiotherapy and concomitant high dose chemotherapy in non resectable stage IV locally advanced HNSCC
T2 - Results of a GORTEC randomized trial
AU - Bourhis, Jean
AU - Lapeyre, Michel
AU - Tortochaux, Jacques
AU - Lusinchi, Antoine
AU - Etessami, Atoussa
AU - Ducourtieux, Murielle
AU - Geoffrois, Lionel
AU - Domenge, Christian
AU - Verrelle, Pierre
AU - Wibault, Pierre
AU - Janot, Franois
AU - Temam, Stephane
AU - Blanchard, Pierre
AU - Tao, Yun G.
AU - Auperin, Anne
PY - 2011/7/1
Y1 - 2011/7/1
N2 - Background: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a strong increase of the dose-intensity of concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) in patients with far advanced non metastatic HNSCC. Methods: Eligible patients had N3 disease (UICC 1997) and the primary tumor and/or the node(s) had to be strictly unresectable. Patients with palpable N2B-C were also eligible if massive nodal involvement was present. 109 patients were included, with 53 randomized to RT-CT and 56 to accelerated RT. In the RT-CT arm, the RT regimen consisted of 64 Gy in 5 weeks and the CT regimen consisted of synchronous CDDP 100 mg/m 2 on days 2, 16, and 30 and 5FU 1000 mg/m 2 on days1-5 and 29-33 of the RT course. After RT-CT, two adjuvant cycles of CDDP-5FU were delivered in good responders. A control arm was using a very accelerated RT, delivering 64 Gy in 3 weeks. Results: The most common tumor sites were oropharynx and hypopharynx. Most of the patients had T4 disease (70%) and 100% had a massive nodal involvement (mainly N3 with a mean nodal size >7 cm in both arms). A significant difference was observed in favor of the RT-CT arm (p = 0.005) in terms of cumulative incidence of local regional failure or distant metastases. However, the overall survival and event free survival rates were not significantly different between the two arms (p = 0.70 and 0.16, respectively). The lack of survival benefit in favor of the RT-CT was partly due to an excess of initial early treatment related death in the RT-CT arm. Conclusion: The very intense RT-CT schedule was more efficient on disease control, but was also more toxic than accelerated RT alone, pointing out that there was no clear improvement of the therapeutic index. This study shows the limits of dose-intensification, with regard to concomitant RT-CT.
AB - Background: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a strong increase of the dose-intensity of concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) in patients with far advanced non metastatic HNSCC. Methods: Eligible patients had N3 disease (UICC 1997) and the primary tumor and/or the node(s) had to be strictly unresectable. Patients with palpable N2B-C were also eligible if massive nodal involvement was present. 109 patients were included, with 53 randomized to RT-CT and 56 to accelerated RT. In the RT-CT arm, the RT regimen consisted of 64 Gy in 5 weeks and the CT regimen consisted of synchronous CDDP 100 mg/m 2 on days 2, 16, and 30 and 5FU 1000 mg/m 2 on days1-5 and 29-33 of the RT course. After RT-CT, two adjuvant cycles of CDDP-5FU were delivered in good responders. A control arm was using a very accelerated RT, delivering 64 Gy in 3 weeks. Results: The most common tumor sites were oropharynx and hypopharynx. Most of the patients had T4 disease (70%) and 100% had a massive nodal involvement (mainly N3 with a mean nodal size >7 cm in both arms). A significant difference was observed in favor of the RT-CT arm (p = 0.005) in terms of cumulative incidence of local regional failure or distant metastases. However, the overall survival and event free survival rates were not significantly different between the two arms (p = 0.70 and 0.16, respectively). The lack of survival benefit in favor of the RT-CT was partly due to an excess of initial early treatment related death in the RT-CT arm. Conclusion: The very intense RT-CT schedule was more efficient on disease control, but was also more toxic than accelerated RT alone, pointing out that there was no clear improvement of the therapeutic index. This study shows the limits of dose-intensification, with regard to concomitant RT-CT.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Dose intensity
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051781309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 21831465
AN - SCOPUS:80051781309
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 100
SP - 56
EP - 61
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 1
ER -