TY - JOUR
T1 - Addressing the dichotomy between individual and societal approaches to personalised medicine in oncology
AU - the IBCD-Faculty
AU - Salgado, Roberto
AU - Solit, David B.
AU - Rimm, David L.
AU - Bogaerts, Jan
AU - Canetta, Renzo
AU - Lively, Tracy
AU - Lyerly, Kim
AU - Span, Paul N.
AU - Bateman-House, Alison
AU - Makady, Amr
AU - Bergmann, L.
AU - Nagai, Sumimasa
AU - Smith, Chris
AU - Robson, Mark
AU - Savage, Mary
AU - Voest, Emile
AU - Sweeney, Christopher
AU - Lambin, Philippe
AU - Thomas, Marlene
AU - Harris, Lyndsay
AU - Lacombe, Denis
AU - Massard, Chistophe
AU - Bernards, Rene
AU - Sullivan, Richard
AU - Tejpar, Sabine
AU - Lukinova, Nina
AU - Lyerly, Herbert K.
AU - Moore, Helen
AU - Smith, Malcolm A.
AU - Yee, Laura
AU - DuBois, Ray
AU - Hahn, William C.
AU - Janne, Pasi
AU - Willman, Cheryl L.
AU - Rimm, David
AU - Bergmann, Lothar
AU - Cree, Ian A.
AU - Hegde, Priti
AU - Hopper, Shirley
AU - Robson, Marc
AU - Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus
AU - Nichols, Gwen
AU - Maignen, Francois
AU - Besse, Benjamin
AU - Swierzewski, Rafal
AU - Kiermaier, Astrid
AU - Massard, Christophe
AU - Caliguri, Michael
AU - Velculescu, Victor
AU - Foggi, Paolo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Academic, industry, regulatory leaders and patient advocates in cancer clinical research met in November 2018 at the Innovation and Biomarkers in Cancer Drug Development meeting in Brussels to address the existing dichotomy between increasing calls for personalised oncology approaches based on individual molecular profiles and the need to make resource and regulatory decisions at the societal level in differing health-care delivery systems around the globe. Novel clinical trial designs, the utility and limitations of real-world evidence (RWE)and emerging technologies for profiling patient tumours and tumour-derived DNA in plasma were discussed. While randomised clinical trials remain the gold standard approach to defining clinical utility of local and systemic therapeutic interventions, the broader adoption of comprehensive tumour profiling and novel trial designs coupled with RWE may allow patient and physician autonomy to be appropriately balanced with broader assessments of safety and overall societal benefit.
AB - Academic, industry, regulatory leaders and patient advocates in cancer clinical research met in November 2018 at the Innovation and Biomarkers in Cancer Drug Development meeting in Brussels to address the existing dichotomy between increasing calls for personalised oncology approaches based on individual molecular profiles and the need to make resource and regulatory decisions at the societal level in differing health-care delivery systems around the globe. Novel clinical trial designs, the utility and limitations of real-world evidence (RWE)and emerging technologies for profiling patient tumours and tumour-derived DNA in plasma were discussed. While randomised clinical trials remain the gold standard approach to defining clinical utility of local and systemic therapeutic interventions, the broader adoption of comprehensive tumour profiling and novel trial designs coupled with RWE may allow patient and physician autonomy to be appropriately balanced with broader assessments of safety and overall societal benefit.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Clinical trials
KW - Evidence-driven optimal health-care delivery
KW - Health technology assessment
KW - Molecular and immunologic profiling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065035041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.03.025
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.03.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 31060925
AN - SCOPUS:85065035041
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 114
SP - 128
EP - 136
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -