TY - JOUR
T1 - ALK resistance mutations and efficacy of lorlatinib in advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non–small-cell lung cancer
AU - Shaw, Alice T.
AU - Solomon, Benjamin J.
AU - Besse, Benjamin
AU - Bauer, Todd M.
AU - Lin, Chia Chi
AU - Soo, Ross A.
AU - Riely, Gregory J.
AU - Ignatius Ou, Sai Hong
AU - Clancy, Jill S.
AU - Li, Sherry
AU - Abbattista, Antonello
AU - Thurm, Holger
AU - Satouchi, Miyako
AU - Camidge, D. Ross
AU - Kao, Steven
AU - Chiari, Rita
AU - Gadgeel, Shirish M.
AU - Felip, Enriqueta
AU - Martini, Jean François
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - PURPOSE Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust clinical activity in advanced ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer, including in patients who have failed prior ALK TKIs. Molecular determinants of response to lorlatinib have not been established, but preclinical data suggest that ALK resistance mutations may represent a biomarker of response in previously treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Baseline plasma and tumor tissue samples were collected from 198 patients with ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer from the registrational phase II study of lorlatinib. We analyzed plasma DNA for ALK mutations using Guardant360. Tumor tissue DNA was analyzed using an ALK mutation–focused next-generation sequencing assay. Objective response rate, duration of response, and progression-free survival were evaluated according to ALK mutation status. RESULTS Approximately one quarter of patients had ALK mutations detected by plasma or tissue genotyping. In patients with crizotinib-resistant disease, the efficacy of lorlatinib was comparable among patients with and without ALK mutations using plasma or tissue genotyping. In contrast, in patients who had failed 1 or more second-generation ALK TKIs, objective response rate was higher among patients with ALK mutations (62% v 32% [plasma]; 69% v 27% [tissue]). Progression-free survival was similar in patients with and without ALK mutations on the basis of plasma genotyping (median, 7.3 months v 5.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.81) but significantly longer in patients with ALK mutations identified by tissue genotyping (median, 11.0 months v 5.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.47). CONCLUSION In patients who have failed 1 or more second-generation ALK TKIs, lorlatinib shows greater efficacy in patients with ALK mutations compared with patients without ALK mutations. Tumor genotyping for ALK mutations after failure of a second-generation TKI may identify patients who are more likely to derive clinical benefit from lorlatinib.
AB - PURPOSE Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust clinical activity in advanced ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer, including in patients who have failed prior ALK TKIs. Molecular determinants of response to lorlatinib have not been established, but preclinical data suggest that ALK resistance mutations may represent a biomarker of response in previously treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Baseline plasma and tumor tissue samples were collected from 198 patients with ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer from the registrational phase II study of lorlatinib. We analyzed plasma DNA for ALK mutations using Guardant360. Tumor tissue DNA was analyzed using an ALK mutation–focused next-generation sequencing assay. Objective response rate, duration of response, and progression-free survival were evaluated according to ALK mutation status. RESULTS Approximately one quarter of patients had ALK mutations detected by plasma or tissue genotyping. In patients with crizotinib-resistant disease, the efficacy of lorlatinib was comparable among patients with and without ALK mutations using plasma or tissue genotyping. In contrast, in patients who had failed 1 or more second-generation ALK TKIs, objective response rate was higher among patients with ALK mutations (62% v 32% [plasma]; 69% v 27% [tissue]). Progression-free survival was similar in patients with and without ALK mutations on the basis of plasma genotyping (median, 7.3 months v 5.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.81) but significantly longer in patients with ALK mutations identified by tissue genotyping (median, 11.0 months v 5.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.47). CONCLUSION In patients who have failed 1 or more second-generation ALK TKIs, lorlatinib shows greater efficacy in patients with ALK mutations compared with patients without ALK mutations. Tumor genotyping for ALK mutations after failure of a second-generation TKI may identify patients who are more likely to derive clinical benefit from lorlatinib.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065811977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.18.02236
DO - 10.1200/JCO.18.02236
M3 - Article
C2 - 30892989
AN - SCOPUS:85065811977
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 37
SP - 1370
EP - 1379
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 16
ER -