Amivantamab plus lazertinib versus osimertinib in first-line EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with biomarkers of high-risk disease: a secondary analysis from MARIPOSA

E. Felip, B. C. Cho, V. Gutiérrez, A. Alip, B. Besse, S. Lu, A. I. Spira, N. Girard, R. Califano, S. M. Gadgeel, J. C.H. Yang, S. Yamamoto, K. Azuma, Y. J. Kim, K. H. Lee, P. Danchaivijitr, C. G. Ferreira, Y. Cheng, M. A.N. Sendur, G. C. ChangC. C. Wang, K. Prabhash, Y. Shinno, D. Stroyakovskiy, L. Paz-Ares, J. R. Rodriguez-Cid, C. Martin, M. R.G. Campelo, H. Hayashi, D. Nguyen, P. Tomasini, M. Gottfried, C. Dooms, A. Passaro, M. Schuler, A. C.Z. Gelatti, S. Owen, K. Perdrizet, S. H.I. Ou, J. C. Curtin, J. Zhang, M. Gormley, T. Sun, A. Panchal, M. Ennis, E. Fennema, M. Daksh, S. Sethi, J. M. Bauml, S. H. Lee

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Background: Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) 0.70; P < 0.001], including those with a history of brain metastases (HR 0.69). Patients with TP53 co-mutations, detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), baseline liver metastases, and those without ctDNA clearance on treatment have poor prognoses. We evaluated outcomes in these high-risk subgroups. Patients and methods: This analysis included patients with treatment-naive, EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC randomized to amivantamab-lazertinib (n = 429) or osimertinib (n = 429) in MARIPOSA. Pathogenic alterations were identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of baseline blood ctDNA with Guardant360 CDx. Ex19del and L858R ctDNA in blood was analyzed at baseline and cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1) with Biodesix droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Results: Baseline ctDNA for NGS of pathogenic alterations was available for 636 patients (amivantamab-lazertinib, n = 320; osimertinib, n = 316). Amivantamab-lazertinib improved median PFS (mPFS) versus osimertinib for patients with TP53 co-mutations {18.2 versus 12.9 months; HR 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.87]; P = 0.003} and for patients with wild-type TP53 [22.1 versus 19.9 months; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.52-1.07)]. In patients with EGFR-mutant, ddPCR-detectable baseline ctDNA, amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged mPFS versus osimertinib [20.3 versus 14.8 months; HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53-0.86); P = 0.002]. Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly improved mPFS versus osimertinib in patients without ctDNA clearance at C3D1 [16.5 versus 9.1 months; HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.27-0.87); P = 0.015] and with clearance [24.0 versus 16.5 months; HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.87); P = 0.004]. Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged mPFS versus osimertinib among randomized patients with [18.2 versus 11.0 months; HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.37-0.91); P = 0.017] and without baseline liver metastases [24.0 versus 18.3 months; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.60-0.91); P = 0.004]. Conclusions: Amivantamab-lazertinib effectively overcomes the effect of high-risk features and represents a promising new standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)805-816
    Nombre de pages12
    journalAnnals of Oncology
    Volume35
    Numéro de publication9
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 sept. 2024

    Contient cette citation