TY - JOUR
T1 - An analysis of available biomarker data for targeting cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) in breast cancer
AU - Duso, Bruno Achutti
AU - Ferraro, Emanuela
AU - Mazzarella, Luca
AU - Dagostim Jeremias, Camila
AU - Curigliano, Giuseppe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/5/4
Y1 - 2019/5/4
N2 - Introduction: Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are a standard of care for advanced estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer in combination with hormonal therapy. Recent data from large trials comprising these agents in different settings show that a proportion of patients do not actually achieve a clinical benefit from this class, without a clear-cut panorama of predictive biomarkers. Here, clinical and preclinical evidence regarding plausible alterations that have been studied as possible candidates for better steering the indications of CDK4/6i in clinical practice are reviewed and analyzed. Areas covered: We explored cyclin D-related aberrations, ESR1 mutational profile, pRb levels/loss of RB1 function, cyclin E1-E2 overexpression, CDK6 amplification, PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway interactions, and CDKN2A loss/CDK2 activity. Expert opinion: The complex molecular pathway involving cell cycle regulation still hampers the validation of a single marker to rationally select patients who would benefit the most from CDK4/6i and avoid futile toxicity. We perceive that, through a combination of assembled molecular alterations, both patient and resource allocation can be optimized. In the meanwhile, paired and reproducible tumor analyses, as well as early ctDNA dynamics, are strongly supported through clinical trials.
AB - Introduction: Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are a standard of care for advanced estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer in combination with hormonal therapy. Recent data from large trials comprising these agents in different settings show that a proportion of patients do not actually achieve a clinical benefit from this class, without a clear-cut panorama of predictive biomarkers. Here, clinical and preclinical evidence regarding plausible alterations that have been studied as possible candidates for better steering the indications of CDK4/6i in clinical practice are reviewed and analyzed. Areas covered: We explored cyclin D-related aberrations, ESR1 mutational profile, pRb levels/loss of RB1 function, cyclin E1-E2 overexpression, CDK6 amplification, PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway interactions, and CDKN2A loss/CDK2 activity. Expert opinion: The complex molecular pathway involving cell cycle regulation still hampers the validation of a single marker to rationally select patients who would benefit the most from CDK4/6i and avoid futile toxicity. We perceive that, through a combination of assembled molecular alterations, both patient and resource allocation can be optimized. In the meanwhile, paired and reproducible tumor analyses, as well as early ctDNA dynamics, are strongly supported through clinical trials.
KW - biomarker
KW - breast cancer
KW - CDK
KW - CDK4/6
KW - cyclin dependent kinase
KW - precision medicine
KW - resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066403375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23808993.2019.1604136
DO - 10.1080/23808993.2019.1604136
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85066403375
SN - 2380-8993
VL - 4
SP - 129
EP - 138
JO - Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development
JF - Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development
IS - 3
ER -