Analysis of the French health ministry's national register of incidents involving medical devices in anaesthesia and intensive care

L. Beydon, F. Conreux, R. Le Gall, D. Safran, J. B. Cazalaa, J. Ancellin, B. Bacchi, J. M. Bedicam, V. Billard, M. A. Dauphin, S. Fougère, G. Freys, F. Fries, C. Itty, G. Krim, J. Labrousse, G. Laguenie, R. Leroyer, P. Lever, M. A. LochetM. P. Macquet, D. Meunier, S. Molliex, J. F. Muir, Y. Nivoche, J. C. Otteni, E. Salgues, F. Saulnier, D. Thiveaud, J. P. Viale

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    37 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    This study details all incidents involving medical devices used in anaesthesia and intensive care reported to the relevant authorities in France in 1998. There were 1004 reports during that year. Incidents were classified as serious (harmful to patients) in 11% of cases; death resulted in 2% of cases. Equipment for ventilation and infusion, and monitors of all kinds, accounted for most of the reports, representing 37%, 30% and 12%, respectively, of all reports. The leading causes of failure varied according to the category of device. User errors, quality control problems during production of the device and design faults were the three main causes. The problems identified during the study period enabled the faulty medical devices to be improved in 12-44% of cases. We conclude that post-marketing vigilance is a useful way of improving the quality of medical devices.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)382-387
    Nombre de pages6
    journalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
    Volume86
    Numéro de publication3
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 janv. 2001

    Contient cette citation