TY - JOUR
T1 - Antitumor activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure
T2 - A randomised, multicentre phase II study
AU - Rougier, P.
AU - Lepille, D.
AU - Bennouna, J.
AU - Marre, A.
AU - Ducreux, M.
AU - Mignot, L.
AU - Hua, A.
AU - Méry-Mignard, D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Y. Menu and C. Patriarche for participating as experts in the independent responses review, and the clinical staff at all the centres for their participation, in particular the following principal investigators: J. P. Bergerat, F. X. Caroli-Bosc, D. Kamioner, A. Monnier, P. L. Etienne, P. Marti, G. Piot, J. M.Tigaud, E. Achille, V. Lucas, Y. Mer-rouche, J. M. Vannetzel and F. Morvan. We also thank Jean-Christophe Pouget (statistician) for providing excellent assistance in the preparation of this manuscript and Corinne Couteau for helpful discussions. P. Rougier and D. Méry-Mignard designed the study, and P. Rougier coordinated the study. D. Lepille, J. Bennouna, A. Marre, M. Ducreux and L. Mignot contributed significantly to data accrual. A. Hua managed the study and data documentation for the final report. The study was supported by the Laboratoire Aventis, France.
PY - 2002/1/1
Y1 - 2002/1/1
N2 - Background: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. Patients and Methods: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m2 infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m2 infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m2, both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Results: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was ≥60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). Conclusions: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.
AB - Background: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. Patients and Methods: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m2 infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m2 infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m2, both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Results: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was ≥60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). Conclusions: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.
KW - 5-Fluorouracil
KW - Irinotecan
KW - Metastatic colorectal cancer
KW - Oxaliplatin
KW - Second-line chemotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036771723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/annonc/mdf259
DO - 10.1093/annonc/mdf259
M3 - Article
C2 - 12377643
AN - SCOPUS:0036771723
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 13
SP - 1558
EP - 1567
JO - Annals of Oncology
JF - Annals of Oncology
IS - 10
ER -