TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing preferences in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - Phase i and ii of questionnaire development
AU - Bonomo, Pierluigi
AU - Maruelli, Alice
AU - Saieva, Calogero
AU - Taylor, Katherine
AU - Singer, Susanne
AU - Patelli, Zaira
AU - Rogers, Simon
AU - Mattavelli, Davide
AU - Simon, Christian
AU - Scotté, Florian
AU - de Oliveira, Thiago Bueno
AU - Murphy, Barbara
AU - Rhoten, Bethany Andrews
AU - Tassini, Umberto
AU - Fallon, Marie
AU - Galitis, Ourania Nicolatou
AU - Yarom, Noam
AU - Bergamini, Cristiana
AU - Bossi, Paolo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Shared-decision making for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is challenged by the difficulty to integrate the patient perception of value within the framework of a multidisciplinary team approach. The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire to assess the preferences of HNSCC patients with respect to the disease trajectory, expected treatment, and toxicities. In accordance with the standardized EORTC Quality of Life Group’s methodology for the development of quality of life modules, a phase 1–2 study was envisaged. Following a systematic review of the literature, a consolidated list of 28 issues was administered through a semi-structured interview to 111 patients from 7 institutions in 5 countries. Overall, “cure of disease”, “survival”, and “trusting in health care professionals” were the 3 most common priorities, being chosen by 87.3%, 73.6% and 59.1% of patients, respectively. When assessing the correlation with the treatment subgroup, the issue of “being thoroughly and sincerely informed about treatments’ efficacy and survival expectation” was highly prevalent in an independent manner (71.4%, 75% and 90% of patients in the follow-up, palliative and curative subgroups, respectively). Based on prespecified scoring criteria, a 24-item list was generated. Pending clinical applicability, further testing and validation of the questionnaire are warranted.
AB - Shared-decision making for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is challenged by the difficulty to integrate the patient perception of value within the framework of a multidisciplinary team approach. The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire to assess the preferences of HNSCC patients with respect to the disease trajectory, expected treatment, and toxicities. In accordance with the standardized EORTC Quality of Life Group’s methodology for the development of quality of life modules, a phase 1–2 study was envisaged. Following a systematic review of the literature, a consolidated list of 28 issues was administered through a semi-structured interview to 111 patients from 7 institutions in 5 countries. Overall, “cure of disease”, “survival”, and “trusting in health care professionals” were the 3 most common priorities, being chosen by 87.3%, 73.6% and 59.1% of patients, respectively. When assessing the correlation with the treatment subgroup, the issue of “being thoroughly and sincerely informed about treatments’ efficacy and survival expectation” was highly prevalent in an independent manner (71.4%, 75% and 90% of patients in the follow-up, palliative and curative subgroups, respectively). Based on prespecified scoring criteria, a 24-item list was generated. Pending clinical applicability, further testing and validation of the questionnaire are warranted.
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Multimodal therapies
KW - Patient preferences
KW - Patient priorities
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097187969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers12123577
DO - 10.3390/cancers12123577
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097187969
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 12
M1 - 3577
ER -