TY - JOUR
T1 - Atezolizumab Combined with Platinum and Maintenance Niraparib for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer with a Platinum-Free Interval >6 Months
T2 - ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA Phase III Trial
AU - González-Martín, Antonio
AU - Rubio, María Jesús
AU - Heitz, Florian
AU - Depont Christensen, René
AU - Colombo, Nicoletta
AU - Van Gorp, Toon
AU - Romeo, Margarita
AU - Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
AU - Gaba, Lydia
AU - Leary, Alexandra
AU - De Sande, Luis Miguel
AU - Lebreton, Coriolan
AU - Redondo, Andrés
AU - Fabbro, Michel
AU - Barretina Ginesta, Maria Pilar
AU - Follana, Philippe
AU - Pérez-Fidalgo, J. Alejandro
AU - Rodrigues, Manuel
AU - Santaballa, Ana
AU - Sabatier, Renaud
AU - Bermejo-Pérez, Maria José
AU - Lotz, Jean Pierre
AU - Pardo, Beatriz
AU - Marquina, Gloria
AU - Sánchez-Lorenzo, Luisa
AU - Quindós, María
AU - Estévez-García, Purificación
AU - Guerra Alía, Eva
AU - Manso, Luis
AU - Casado, Victoria
AU - Kommoss, Stefan
AU - Tognon, Germana
AU - Henry, Stéphanie
AU - Bruchim, Ilan
AU - Oaknin, Ana
AU - Selle, Frédéric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - PURPOSETo evaluate atezolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) followed by maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer.METHODSThe multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03598270) enrolled patients with measurable high-grade serous, endometrioid, or undifferentiated recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one or two previous CT lines (most recent including platinum) and had a treatment-free interval since last platinum (TFIp) of >6 months. Patients were stratified by investigator-selected carboplatin doublet, TFIp, BRCA status, and PD-L1 status in de novo biopsy and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either atezolizumab or placebo throughout standard therapy comprising six cycles of a carboplatin doublet followed (in patients with response/stable disease) by maintenance niraparib until progression. The primary end point was investigator-Assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1.RESULTSBetween November 2018 and January 2022, 417 patients were randomly assigned (15% BRCA-mutated, 36% PD-L1-positive, 66% TFIp >12 months, 11% previous poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor after frontline CT, and 53% previous bevacizumab). Median follow-up was 28.6 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 30.5 months). Atezolizumab did not significantly improve PFS (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.10]; P =.28). Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 12.1 months) with atezolizumab versus 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.2 months) with standard therapy. Subgroup analyses generally showed consistent results, including analyses by PD-L1 status. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI, 39 to 52) with atezolizumab and 43% (95% CI, 36 to 49) with standard therapy. The safety profile was as expected from previous experience of these drugs.CONCLUSIONCombining atezolizumab with CT and maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer did not significantly improve PFS or the ORR.
AB - PURPOSETo evaluate atezolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) followed by maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer.METHODSThe multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03598270) enrolled patients with measurable high-grade serous, endometrioid, or undifferentiated recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one or two previous CT lines (most recent including platinum) and had a treatment-free interval since last platinum (TFIp) of >6 months. Patients were stratified by investigator-selected carboplatin doublet, TFIp, BRCA status, and PD-L1 status in de novo biopsy and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either atezolizumab or placebo throughout standard therapy comprising six cycles of a carboplatin doublet followed (in patients with response/stable disease) by maintenance niraparib until progression. The primary end point was investigator-Assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1.RESULTSBetween November 2018 and January 2022, 417 patients were randomly assigned (15% BRCA-mutated, 36% PD-L1-positive, 66% TFIp >12 months, 11% previous poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor after frontline CT, and 53% previous bevacizumab). Median follow-up was 28.6 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 30.5 months). Atezolizumab did not significantly improve PFS (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.10]; P =.28). Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 12.1 months) with atezolizumab versus 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.2 months) with standard therapy. Subgroup analyses generally showed consistent results, including analyses by PD-L1 status. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI, 39 to 52) with atezolizumab and 43% (95% CI, 36 to 49) with standard therapy. The safety profile was as expected from previous experience of these drugs.CONCLUSIONCombining atezolizumab with CT and maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer did not significantly improve PFS or the ORR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205424052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.24.00668
DO - 10.1200/JCO.24.00668
M3 - Article
C2 - 39292975
AN - SCOPUS:85205424052
SN - 0732-183X
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
ER -