Atezolizumab Combined with Platinum and Maintenance Niraparib for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer with a Platinum-Free Interval >6 Months: ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA Phase III Trial

Antonio González-Martín, María Jesús Rubio, Florian Heitz, René Depont Christensen, Nicoletta Colombo, Toon Van Gorp, Margarita Romeo, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Lydia Gaba, Alexandra Leary, Luis Miguel De Sande, Coriolan Lebreton, Andrés Redondo, Michel Fabbro, Maria Pilar Barretina Ginesta, Philippe Follana, J. Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Manuel Rodrigues, Ana Santaballa, Renaud SabatierMaria José Bermejo-Pérez, Jean Pierre Lotz, Beatriz Pardo, Gloria Marquina, Luisa Sánchez-Lorenzo, María Quindós, Purificación Estévez-García, Eva Guerra Alía, Luis Manso, Victoria Casado, Stefan Kommoss, Germana Tognon, Stéphanie Henry, Ilan Bruchim, Ana Oaknin, Frédéric Selle

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    Résumé

    PURPOSETo evaluate atezolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) followed by maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer.METHODSThe multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03598270) enrolled patients with measurable high-grade serous, endometrioid, or undifferentiated recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one or two previous CT lines (most recent including platinum) and had a treatment-free interval since last platinum (TFIp) of >6 months. Patients were stratified by investigator-selected carboplatin doublet, TFIp, BRCA status, and PD-L1 status in de novo biopsy and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either atezolizumab or placebo throughout standard therapy comprising six cycles of a carboplatin doublet followed (in patients with response/stable disease) by maintenance niraparib until progression. The primary end point was investigator-Assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1.RESULTSBetween November 2018 and January 2022, 417 patients were randomly assigned (15% BRCA-mutated, 36% PD-L1-positive, 66% TFIp >12 months, 11% previous poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor after frontline CT, and 53% previous bevacizumab). Median follow-up was 28.6 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 30.5 months). Atezolizumab did not significantly improve PFS (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.10]; P =.28). Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 12.1 months) with atezolizumab versus 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.2 months) with standard therapy. Subgroup analyses generally showed consistent results, including analyses by PD-L1 status. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI, 39 to 52) with atezolizumab and 43% (95% CI, 36 to 49) with standard therapy. The safety profile was as expected from previous experience of these drugs.CONCLUSIONCombining atezolizumab with CT and maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer did not significantly improve PFS or the ORR.

    langue originaleAnglais
    journalJournal of Clinical Oncology
    Les DOIs
    étatAccepté/sous presse - 1 janv. 2024

    Contient cette citation