TY - JOUR
T1 - Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression
AU - Galluzzi, Lorenzo
AU - Pietrocola, Federico
AU - Bravo-San Pedro, José Manuel
AU - Amaravadi, Ravi K.
AU - Baehrecke, Eric H.
AU - Cecconi, Francesco
AU - Codogno, Patrice
AU - Debnath, Jayanta
AU - Gewirtz, David A.
AU - Karantza, Vassiliki
AU - Kimmelman, Alec
AU - Kumar, Sharad
AU - Levine, Beth
AU - Maiuri, Maria Chiara
AU - Martin, Seamus J.
AU - Penninger, Josef
AU - Piacentini, Mauro
AU - Rubinsztein, David C.
AU - Simon, Hans Uwe
AU - Simonsen, Anne
AU - Thorburn, Andrew M.
AU - Velasco, Guillermo
AU - Ryan, Kevin M.
AU - Kroemer, Guido
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Autophagy plays a key role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. In healthy cells, such a homeostatic activity constitutes a robust barrier against malignant transformation. Accordingly, many oncoproteins inhibit, and several oncosuppressor proteins promote, autophagy. Moreover, autophagy is required for optimal anticancer immunosurveillance. In neoplastic cells, however, autophagic responses constitute a means to cope with intracellular and environmental stress, thus favoring tumor progression. This implies that at least in some cases, oncogenesis proceeds along with a temporary inhibition of autophagy or a gain of molecular functions that antagonize its oncosuppressive activity. Here, we discuss the differential impact of autophagy on distinct phases of tumorigenesis and the implications of this concept for the use of autophagy modulators in cancer therapy. Autophagy has been described to have tumor-suppressive as well as tumor-promoting functions. This review discusses how stage and context alters the role for autophagy in cancer, and argues for further research prior to targeting autophagy in cancer therapy.
AB - Autophagy plays a key role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. In healthy cells, such a homeostatic activity constitutes a robust barrier against malignant transformation. Accordingly, many oncoproteins inhibit, and several oncosuppressor proteins promote, autophagy. Moreover, autophagy is required for optimal anticancer immunosurveillance. In neoplastic cells, however, autophagic responses constitute a means to cope with intracellular and environmental stress, thus favoring tumor progression. This implies that at least in some cases, oncogenesis proceeds along with a temporary inhibition of autophagy or a gain of molecular functions that antagonize its oncosuppressive activity. Here, we discuss the differential impact of autophagy on distinct phases of tumorigenesis and the implications of this concept for the use of autophagy modulators in cancer therapy. Autophagy has been described to have tumor-suppressive as well as tumor-promoting functions. This review discusses how stage and context alters the role for autophagy in cancer, and argues for further research prior to targeting autophagy in cancer therapy.
KW - Adaptive stress responses
KW - Beclin 1
KW - KRAS
KW - inflammation
KW - mitophagy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926252071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15252/embj.201490784
DO - 10.15252/embj.201490784
M3 - Article
C2 - 25712477
AN - SCOPUS:84926252071
SN - 0261-4189
VL - 34
SP - 856
EP - 880
JO - EMBO Journal
JF - EMBO Journal
IS - 7
ER -