TY - JOUR
T1 - BCG-unresponsive high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
T2 - what does the practicing urologist need to know?
AU - Lebacle, Cedric
AU - Loriot, Yohann
AU - Irani, Jacques
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - Purpose: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is a well-established treatment for preventing or delaying tumour recurrence following high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) resection. However, many patients will experience recurrence or progression during or following BCG. This scenario has been one of the most challenging in urologic oncology for several decades since BCG implementation. Finally, significant progress has occurred lately. The aim of this review was to summarize for the practising urologist the current treatment options available in 2020 or expected to be ready for routine use in the near future for patients with high-risk NMIBC who experience BCG failure. Methods: Narrative review using data through the end of 2020. Results: First, the definition of BCG unresponsive disease which is critical in counseling and managing patients has finally reached a consensus. Second, some promising options other than radical cystectomy are finally available and many other should be in a near future. The options can be categorized as chemotherapy, device-assisted therapy, check-point inhibitors, new intravesical and systemic agents and sequential combinations of these newer modalities with conventional therapy. Conclusions: Considering the options that are currently under scrutiny, many of which in phase III trials, clinicians should have at their disposal several new treatment options in the next five years.
AB - Purpose: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is a well-established treatment for preventing or delaying tumour recurrence following high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) resection. However, many patients will experience recurrence or progression during or following BCG. This scenario has been one of the most challenging in urologic oncology for several decades since BCG implementation. Finally, significant progress has occurred lately. The aim of this review was to summarize for the practising urologist the current treatment options available in 2020 or expected to be ready for routine use in the near future for patients with high-risk NMIBC who experience BCG failure. Methods: Narrative review using data through the end of 2020. Results: First, the definition of BCG unresponsive disease which is critical in counseling and managing patients has finally reached a consensus. Second, some promising options other than radical cystectomy are finally available and many other should be in a near future. The options can be categorized as chemotherapy, device-assisted therapy, check-point inhibitors, new intravesical and systemic agents and sequential combinations of these newer modalities with conventional therapy. Conclusions: Considering the options that are currently under scrutiny, many of which in phase III trials, clinicians should have at their disposal several new treatment options in the next five years.
KW - BCG
KW - BCG failure
KW - NMIBC
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103358853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-021-03666-w
DO - 10.1007/s00345-021-03666-w
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33772322
AN - SCOPUS:85103358853
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 39
SP - 4037
EP - 4046
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 11
ER -