TY - JOUR
T1 - Bipedicled dorsal intercostal artery propeller flaps for reconstruction of extensive cervicothoracic midline defects
AU - Schmidt, Magali
AU - Cristofari, Sarra
AU - Al Madani, Omar
AU - Romano, Golda
AU - Qassemyar, Quentin
AU - Pascal-Moussellard, Hugues
AU - Atlan, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Background: Propeller flaps have been reported to cover cervicothoracic midline defects with lower donor site morbidity compared to muscle flaps. When these defects are extensive, we propose a propeller flap technique that we have named dorsal intercostal artery perforator plus (DICAP+) flap based on two perforator pedicles, to secure the large skin paddle. In this article, we present our experience. Methods: Six propeller DICAP+ flap procedures were performed on five patients, to reconstruct cervicothoracic midline defects. Three of them were caused by tumors and two were secondary to hardware exposure after spinal surgery. Defect sizes ranged from 16 × 5 to 24 × 9 cm. Every propeller flap was harvested on two perforators including one DICAP, and rotated from 80° to 180°. Results: Skin ellipse size ranged from 15 × 7 cm or 82.4 cm2 to 25 × 12 cm or 235.5 cm2, equal to a mean surface area of 160 cm2. The donor site was closed by primary suturing in four of the six procedures, by a contralateral propeller DICAP flap in one patient, and was left to heal by secondary intention in another one. All six flaps successfully covered the underlying defects with no evidence of partial or complete necrosis. No other complications were observed at recipient and donor sites. The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 2 years. Conclusions: Propeller flaps based on two dorsal perforators including one dorsal intercostal artery perforator, DICAP+, are a reliable means of reconstructing extensive cervicothoracic midline defects.
AB - Background: Propeller flaps have been reported to cover cervicothoracic midline defects with lower donor site morbidity compared to muscle flaps. When these defects are extensive, we propose a propeller flap technique that we have named dorsal intercostal artery perforator plus (DICAP+) flap based on two perforator pedicles, to secure the large skin paddle. In this article, we present our experience. Methods: Six propeller DICAP+ flap procedures were performed on five patients, to reconstruct cervicothoracic midline defects. Three of them were caused by tumors and two were secondary to hardware exposure after spinal surgery. Defect sizes ranged from 16 × 5 to 24 × 9 cm. Every propeller flap was harvested on two perforators including one DICAP, and rotated from 80° to 180°. Results: Skin ellipse size ranged from 15 × 7 cm or 82.4 cm2 to 25 × 12 cm or 235.5 cm2, equal to a mean surface area of 160 cm2. The donor site was closed by primary suturing in four of the six procedures, by a contralateral propeller DICAP flap in one patient, and was left to heal by secondary intention in another one. All six flaps successfully covered the underlying defects with no evidence of partial or complete necrosis. No other complications were observed at recipient and donor sites. The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 2 years. Conclusions: Propeller flaps based on two dorsal perforators including one dorsal intercostal artery perforator, DICAP+, are a reliable means of reconstructing extensive cervicothoracic midline defects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084798045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/micr.30595
DO - 10.1002/micr.30595
M3 - Article
C2 - 32415878
AN - SCOPUS:85084798045
SN - 0738-1085
VL - 40
SP - 656
EP - 662
JO - Microsurgery
JF - Microsurgery
IS - 6
ER -